Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Tzadik Gozer v'HaShem M'Kayem

I have had the amazing opportunity over the years to drive a certain talmud chacham from Eretz Yisrael to his various appointments when he is here in Chicago visiting.  Once while waiting at a red signal that seemed to be taking way too long, I muttered: "Nu!"  As if on cue the light immediately changed to green.  The Rav smiled and said, "Tzakik gozer and HaShem m'kayem!"  I demurred (but still felt the glow of having been called a tzadik by that honest tzadik).

The truth is, though, there is (according to the Shita M'kubetzes) an explicit gemara that shows how far the g'zeira of a tzadik can go.  The gemara (Bava Kama 50a) relates that the daughter of N'chunia the well digger (N'chunia used to dig wells and watering holes for those on their way to Yerushalayim three times a year) fell into a larger cistern.  Everyone came running to tell R' Chanina ben Dosa to get counsel on how to save her.  R' Chanina ben Dosa told them not to worry.  An hour or so passed and the young lady was fading, so them came again to R' Chanina ben Dosa and got the same "answer".  Another hour passed and it was impossible for her to survive any longer; so they again came running to R' Chanina ben Dosa.  This time he said, "She is already out."  So it was and when they asked her how she was saved, she told them an old sage (Avraham Avinu [Rashi]) had come along with a ram (the ram of Yitzcha [Rashi again]) and saved her.  The astonished townspeople went back and asked R' Chanina ben Dosa if he was a prophet.  "Not a prophet nor the son of a prophet.  It is simply that it is impossible that the children of such a tzadik could die in something for which their father had been moser nefesh.

One of those great "Tales of Tzadikim" stories on which we like to rear our children.  One problem, the gemara in its very next breath sputters, "But his son died of thirst!".  The gemara has an answer.  Tosefos has an issue with the answer, but straightens things out.  You are welcome and encouraged to go look.

The Shita M'kubetzes, a talmid of the Radvaz, says that it is not a problem, because R' Chanina ben Dosa died before the son did... "and therefore what?", you are wondering.  The Shita says in the name of his Rebbi, that as long as R' Chanina ben Dosa was in the world, HaShem would respect his feelings on this matter.  Apparently "tzadik gozer v'HaShem m'kayem" means much more than just the personal situation of the tzadik.  It means that a tzadik actually affects how HaShem conducts Himself with the entire world.  Now go back and learn Avraham Avinu's discussion with HaShem regarding S'dom.  I have always learned that discussion and Avraham Avinu reaching for a deeper understanding of HaShem's midas haChesed.  Apparently, though, it can also be understood as Avraham Avinu expressing his own feelings about how far midas ha'chesed must go; and HaShem, so to speak, respects those feelings.

That's just awesome.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...