Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Tzadik Gozer v'HaShem M'Kayem

I have had the amazing opportunity over the years to drive a certain talmud chacham from Eretz Yisrael to his various appointments when he is here in Chicago visiting.  Once while waiting at a red signal that seemed to be taking way too long, I muttered: "Nu!"  As if on cue the light immediately changed to green.  The Rav smiled and said, "Tzakik gozer and HaShem m'kayem!"  I demurred (but still felt the glow of having been called a tzadik by that honest tzadik).

The truth is, though, there is (according to the Shita M'kubetzes) an explicit gemara that shows how far the g'zeira of a tzadik can go.  The gemara (Bava Kama 50a) relates that the daughter of N'chunia the well digger (N'chunia used to dig wells and watering holes for those on their way to Yerushalayim three times a year) fell into a larger cistern.  Everyone came running to tell R' Chanina ben Dosa to get counsel on how to save her.  R' Chanina ben Dosa told them not to worry.  An hour or so passed and the young lady was fading, so them came again to R' Chanina ben Dosa and got the same "answer".  Another hour passed and it was impossible for her to survive any longer; so they again came running to R' Chanina ben Dosa.  This time he said, "She is already out."  So it was and when they asked her how she was saved, she told them an old sage (Avraham Avinu [Rashi]) had come along with a ram (the ram of Yitzcha [Rashi again]) and saved her.  The astonished townspeople went back and asked R' Chanina ben Dosa if he was a prophet.  "Not a prophet nor the son of a prophet.  It is simply that it is impossible that the children of such a tzadik could die in something for which their father had been moser nefesh.

One of those great "Tales of Tzadikim" stories on which we like to rear our children.  One problem, the gemara in its very next breath sputters, "But his son died of thirst!".  The gemara has an answer.  Tosefos has an issue with the answer, but straightens things out.  You are welcome and encouraged to go look.

The Shita M'kubetzes, a talmid of the Radvaz, says that it is not a problem, because R' Chanina ben Dosa died before the son did... "and therefore what?", you are wondering.  The Shita says in the name of his Rebbi, that as long as R' Chanina ben Dosa was in the world, HaShem would respect his feelings on this matter.  Apparently "tzadik gozer v'HaShem m'kayem" means much more than just the personal situation of the tzadik.  It means that a tzadik actually affects how HaShem conducts Himself with the entire world.  Now go back and learn Avraham Avinu's discussion with HaShem regarding S'dom.  I have always learned that discussion and Avraham Avinu reaching for a deeper understanding of HaShem's midas haChesed.  Apparently, though, it can also be understood as Avraham Avinu expressing his own feelings about how far midas ha'chesed must go; and HaShem, so to speak, respects those feelings.

That's just awesome.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...