Skip to main content
Attitude of the Giver and Attitude of the Receiver

The Sifsei Chaim notes that the Chovos ha'l'Lavos seems to have contradictory statements regarding his impression of both givers and receivers of chesed. "I am amazed", says the Chovos ha'l'Lavos, "by those who expect gratitude for doing a chesed for someone." The Chovos ha'l'Lavos has explained that no one can damage or benefit another by even a mustard seed worth of value, for "hakol bidei shamayim" -- everything is in the hands of heaven. So that means that that the receiver is not really obligated to be grateful to someone who only carried out the Will of the Creator and brought His decree to fruition, right? Continues the Chovos ha'l'Lavos, "I am amazed by those people who do not have hakaras hatov for others who try to benefit them, even if they are not able to carry out their good intentions." Hmmm... and to make matters even worse, the Chovos ha'l'Lavos adds one more category of surprising individuals; those who feel they must flatter and praise others for helping them! How does one make sense of these (seemingly) contradictory statements?

There is a single outlook that removes the contradiction and clarifies everything. Says the Sifsei Chaim: hakaras hatov, gratitude, and doing chesed are all avodas HaShem. Of course no one can help or hurt me unless by decree of the Creator -- but the Creator chooses people who want to do good to actually carry out His decrees for good, and those who wish to do evil to carry out His other decrees. Of course no one can help you unless HaShem wants you to get help, but the one who actually helps you deserves your gratitude for wanting to help you. In fact, it now follows (as pointed out by the Chovos ha'l'Lavos) that I owe gratitude to anyone who wants to help me, whether or not they are successful. Moreover, even if they did if for ulterior motives, so what? HaShem decreed a benefit for you and chose that person to carry it out; his motives are irrelevant. On the other hand, the "good deed doer" has no right to expect anything at all... he was only carrying out the decree of the Almighty. Further, it obviously makes no sense to flatter and overly praise the person who benefits me, because I would have received that benefit in any case.

Just to add my own thought... this underlying principle of focusing solely on my obligations and measuring my actions against the yardstick of avodas HaShem can be applied to all areas of life. It really turns every "bein adam l'chavero" into a "bein adam lamakom". The more I can remain focused on that dimension of my actions, the less opportunity there is for anger, jealousy, revenge, holding grudges, and many other bad midos. To indulge myself just a little in my previous life as a physicist: this attitude turns the world into a thermometer to measure the intensity of my avodas HaShem rather than a thermostat that I am constantly trying (unsuccessfully, of course) to set for my personal benefit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...