Skip to main content
Attitude of the Giver and Attitude of the Receiver

The Sifsei Chaim notes that the Chovos ha'l'Lavos seems to have contradictory statements regarding his impression of both givers and receivers of chesed. "I am amazed", says the Chovos ha'l'Lavos, "by those who expect gratitude for doing a chesed for someone." The Chovos ha'l'Lavos has explained that no one can damage or benefit another by even a mustard seed worth of value, for "hakol bidei shamayim" -- everything is in the hands of heaven. So that means that that the receiver is not really obligated to be grateful to someone who only carried out the Will of the Creator and brought His decree to fruition, right? Continues the Chovos ha'l'Lavos, "I am amazed by those people who do not have hakaras hatov for others who try to benefit them, even if they are not able to carry out their good intentions." Hmmm... and to make matters even worse, the Chovos ha'l'Lavos adds one more category of surprising individuals; those who feel they must flatter and praise others for helping them! How does one make sense of these (seemingly) contradictory statements?

There is a single outlook that removes the contradiction and clarifies everything. Says the Sifsei Chaim: hakaras hatov, gratitude, and doing chesed are all avodas HaShem. Of course no one can help or hurt me unless by decree of the Creator -- but the Creator chooses people who want to do good to actually carry out His decrees for good, and those who wish to do evil to carry out His other decrees. Of course no one can help you unless HaShem wants you to get help, but the one who actually helps you deserves your gratitude for wanting to help you. In fact, it now follows (as pointed out by the Chovos ha'l'Lavos) that I owe gratitude to anyone who wants to help me, whether or not they are successful. Moreover, even if they did if for ulterior motives, so what? HaShem decreed a benefit for you and chose that person to carry it out; his motives are irrelevant. On the other hand, the "good deed doer" has no right to expect anything at all... he was only carrying out the decree of the Almighty. Further, it obviously makes no sense to flatter and overly praise the person who benefits me, because I would have received that benefit in any case.

Just to add my own thought... this underlying principle of focusing solely on my obligations and measuring my actions against the yardstick of avodas HaShem can be applied to all areas of life. It really turns every "bein adam l'chavero" into a "bein adam lamakom". The more I can remain focused on that dimension of my actions, the less opportunity there is for anger, jealousy, revenge, holding grudges, and many other bad midos. To indulge myself just a little in my previous life as a physicist: this attitude turns the world into a thermometer to measure the intensity of my avodas HaShem rather than a thermostat that I am constantly trying (unsuccessfully, of course) to set for my personal benefit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...