Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְעָבְד֔וֹ בְּכָל־לְבַבְכֶ֖ם/...and to serve Him with all of your mind/heart...  Not that the word for "serve" used here is עבודה, which generally refers to the service and order or offerings brought in the Beis HaMikdash.  Given that, Chazal explain that to "serve" HaShem with your mind/heart refers to prayer.  Prayer, therefore, is the spiritual counterpoint to the physical animal/grain/wine offerings.  That's why we have a morning and afternoon daily service, which corresponds to the קרבן תמיד/daily/continuous offering.  We have an evening service that corresponds to the burning of limbs and fats that sometimes (often) remained after the offerings themselves had been made.  We have an extra prayer service on Shabbos, Yom Tov, and Rosh Chodesh that corresponds to the מוסף/extra offerings on those days.  (There is also a hint here to what both prayer and the sacrificial offering service is all about; the word for offering/sacrifice in the Holy Tongue is "קרבן", which means to come closer.  More about that later,  בעזרת השם.)

The examples are from none other than our exalted patriarchs.

Avraham Avinu established shacharis (B'reishis 19:26):  'וַיַּשְׁכֵּ֥ם אַבְרָהָ֖ם בַּבֹּ֑קֶר אֶ֨ל־הַמָּק֔וֹם אֲשֶׁר־עָ֥מַד שָׁ֖ם אֶת־פְּנֵ֥י ה/Avraham arose early in the morning to the place where he had stood before HaShem.  We see that prayer should be said standing and in a consistent place.  (We also see that Avraham Avinu davened k'vasikin; just saying.)

Yitzchak Avinu established mincha (B'reishis 24:63): וַיֵּצֵ֥א יִצְחָ֛ק לָשׂ֥וּחַ בַּשָּׂדֶ֖ה לִפְנ֣וֹת עָ֑רֶב /Yitzchak went out to the field to converse toward evening.  From here we see that prayer is meant to be a conversation.

Yaakov Avinu established ma'ariv (B'reishis 28:11): וַיִּפְגַּ֨ע בַּמָּק֜וֹם וַיָּ֤לֶן שָׁם֙ כִּי־בָ֣א הַשֶּׁ֔מֶשׁ/He encountered the place and lodged there, as the sun had set.  From here we see that prayer is meant to be a serious and meaningful encounter.

(Mussaf?  The Sefer Birchei Yosef 423:2, which is written by the Chida says that Musaf for Rosh Chodesh was instituted by Rochel Imeinu.  Her name is hinted in the first letters of Ro'shei Cho'doshim L'Amecha.)

Now we know that prayer is to be implemented within specific and well defined time windows and is meant to be approached as a meaningful, formal conversation with the Creator.  Serious matters are discussed and real issues addressed.  (See Mishna Brura, siman 98 for the details.)

But what should be the precise content of the prayer?  I am so glad you asked.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Sometimes a Food Loses Its Identity When It Loses Its Bracha; Sometimes It Doesn't

Let's start with a question: Why are We Allowed to Drink Coffee and Whiskey Made by Non-Jews?  Before you ask,"Why would I think that I shouldn't be able to drink whiskey and coffee made by non-Jews?", I'll tell you. Simple, we all know that Chazal made a decree -- known as בישול עכו''ם/bishul akim -- that particular foods cooked by non-Jews are forbidden.  There are basically two criteria that determines if a dish falls into this category:
Is not consumed raw.Fit for a royal banquet. Cooked carrots, therefore, are not a problem since they can be eaten raw (I actually prefer them that way).  Baked beans are find because the are not prestigious enough.  (For great synopsis of the laws, see the article on the Star-K site, FOOD FIT FOR A KING, by Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, shlita.)  There are lots of cool questions and details (baked potatoes are prestigious, does that make even potato chips and issue?) which are for another time.  Clearly, though, both coffee an…

Thought for the Day: Our Job Is השתדלות/Endeavor with All One’s Resources, Not Results

Forrest Gump is a sweet movie from the last century about a relatively clueless -- though quite loveable -- fellow who triggers several history changing/making events of the 20th century.  He also amasses a considerable fortune due to fortuitous stock purchases and business investments.  A model for success, no?

No.  In every event, every stock transaction, and every business investment... our relatively clueless -- though quite loveable -- protagonist is completely passive and simply the beneficiary of good/dumb luck/karma/being at the right place at the right time.  It is not that he is a bad role model, nor a role model for something bad.  He is just not a role model.  Like an ice cube in a glass.  When the glass is empty, the cube rests on the bottom.  When the glass is filled with water, the ice cube bobs to the top. The ice cube is neither good nor bad; it just is.

I recently saw an incredible back story about events leading up to the (long overdue and very much appreciated) rel…

Thought for the Day: Jewish Marriage is a Spiritual Re-Unification

I saw a quite distressing article entitled: "My husband’s Orthodox Jewish family pressured us to call off our wedding."; just to drive home the point, a subtitle was added: "I thought parental disapproval of marriage was a problem of the past. I was wrong."

Why are we so, so ...  well... orthodox and unbending in our refusal to allow the slightest change or breach in this ancient taboo?

Here's what's it's not.  It's not about similar culture, thus easing the integration of two people's lives -- including all their family and extended family.  It may not be easy for a Jew from Flushing, NY to integrate his life with a Jew from Irvine, CA; not a Jew from Sweden with a Jew from Egypt.  Surprise!  Marriage is not designed for nor meant to be easy.

It's also not about having a shared experience about customs.  A S'fardi (of Spanish/African/Turkish descent) Jew from Israel and a Chassidic (of eastern European descent) Jew from have customs as …