Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: When It Is Permitted to Benefit from מלאכה Performed by a Non-Jew on Behalf of a Jew

Here's another in the category of "good grief, that could only happen with you" stories.  Names changed to protect me from the guilty and their friends.  I was spending Shabbos with my daughter's family and a woman whose father was Jewish but whose mother was not Jewish that attended a synagogue of the Conservative Jewish Religion (who is not, of course, Jewish; but fancies herself a conservative Jew); we'll call her Sin.  There was also a Jewish woman who at the time was still attending a Reform Jewish temple; not out of conviction, but due to historical circumstances; we'll call her "Nice, well meaning lady who had been kidnapped as a baby and didn't know any better", or Bambi, for short.  It got late in the day and Sin was bemoaning the fact that the hot water pot was nearly empty.  I told her I didn't know why she didn't just heat herself up some water.  Bambi said, "Oh?  I can do that?"  I said, "No, I'm sorry, but you can't do that."  Sin said, "Hey, wait!  I know I am not what you call religious, but neither is she!'  I replied, in all innocence, "True, but Bambi is a Jew; which you aren't."  Sin stormed out.  Frankly, I can think of worse things than offending Sin.

Suppose, though, that she had added water to the hot pot.  Would the rest of us have been able to benefit from the work done by that non-Jew?  Even more, suppose she had noticed that some of us Jews were opining that we didn't have hot water for coffee on her on volition had added more water; could have used even that water once it became hot?  Before answering, let's review the parameters.

The Torah doesn't want a Jew to do מלאכה on Shabbos.  Chazal extended that to forbid a Jew to benefit from מלאכה done by another Jew on Shabbos.  (At least on Shabbos; but the details are not for now.)  Basically, you shouldn't benefit from the forbidden actions of another Jew.  But what if a goy does מלאכה on Shabbos?  Now things are murkier, because the goy hasn't done anything wrong.  In fact, even if he does the מלאכה for a Jew, there are cases when it is permitted for the Jew to benefit from that מלאכה.  On the other hand, we know that we are not allowed to instruct a goy to do a מלאכה for us on Shabbos.  (There are different reasons given for that decree, but the details are not for now.)

Suppose, now, that the goy does something -- even for you -- that for you would be a forbidden מלאכה (but, of course, for the goy is not forbidden at all).  In that case, says the Magein Avraham, as long as it doesn't enable you to do something you couldn't do before, you are allowed to benefit from his מלאכה.  On classic example is turning on an additional light for you in a room where you were already able to read, albeit with difficulty.  Since you could read before, you are allowed to read now; and even allowed to move closer to the light that the goy just turned on for you.

Shulchan Shlomo (clarifying notes on Hilchos Shabbos section of Shulchan Aruch by R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach) notes that this seems to give you almost unlimited leeway.  Suppose, he asks, I don't mind chewing raw meat, does that mean that if the goy BBQs up a steak for me that I am permitted to eat it? (Obviously not.)  Since it is possible to sit in a cold house, if he lights the furnace for me, am I allowed to enjoy that heat? (Again, obviously not.)  Back to our i-want-hot-water case; since I could drink cold coffee (ew), may I now drink water heated by Sin? (Again and again; nope.)

So what is the criteria?  Bringing many proofs, the Shulchan Shlomo concludes that the Magein Avraham is explaining that Chazal only meant to include actions of the goy which could be considered extensions of an existing מלאכה, but not something totally new.  Increasing the light in the room (even though he actually turned on a new light, that was for his own convenience) is ok.  Creating heat in a room that did not previously have any heat is not ok.  Putting a warm cholent that is fully cooked is ok; even though it gets better as it cooks longer.  Putting a partially cooked cholent back on the fire is not ok; even though it is edible as is.  That is, going from uncooked (even only partially uncooked) to cooked is considered a new מלאכה, whereas going from fully cooked to fully cooked but yummier is only considered the extension of an existing מלאכה.

Since we consider every heating of a cold liquid to be a new act of cooking, I am afraid that I won't be able to drink Sin's coffee.  Oh well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Sometimes a Food Loses Its Identity When It Loses Its Bracha; Sometimes It Doesn't

Let's start with a question: Why are We Allowed to Drink Coffee and Whiskey Made by Non-Jews?  Before you ask,"Why would I think that I shouldn't be able to drink whiskey and coffee made by non-Jews?", I'll tell you. Simple, we all know that Chazal made a decree -- known as בישול עכו''ם/bishul akim -- that particular foods cooked by non-Jews are forbidden.  There are basically two criteria that determines if a dish falls into this category:
Is not consumed raw.Fit for a royal banquet. Cooked carrots, therefore, are not a problem since they can be eaten raw (I actually prefer them that way).  Baked beans are find because the are not prestigious enough.  (For great synopsis of the laws, see the article on the Star-K site, FOOD FIT FOR A KING, by Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, shlita.)  There are lots of cool questions and details (baked potatoes are prestigious, does that make even potato chips and issue?) which are for another time.  Clearly, though, both coffee an…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…