Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Enhancing Observance of a Mitzvah vs Beautifying the Mitzvah Observance

I had forgotten to bring my Shabbos tallis back to shul since our return from visiting the grandchildren in Florida (we have children there also, but I only travel for grandchildren).  Being as it was Friday, I decided to drop it off on my way to work... by bike... in my shorts, helmet, and whatnot.  I got there before the throng of after davening learners had left.  They are all my friends, so of course the all gave my (good natured) grief about coming to shul dressed like that.  On the heels of the ribbing we all agreed, of course, that being embarrassed by the way he is dressed is no excuse to miss a minyan.

Halacha mandates that (besided t'fillin) a man should wear a tallis gadol and be dressed as one would for a formal meeting (I interpret that to mean as I would dress for a job interview).  Now, no matter how beautiful his suit and hat are, he can certainly wear them into the bathroom.  On the other hand, no matter how chintzy his tallis gadol is, he may not wear it into the bathroom.  What's the difference?  My clothing, no matter how nice, are not designated as specifically for davening.  Wearing nicer clothes beautifies my observance of the mitzvah of t'fila; something required of all mitzvos.  On the other hand, since a tallis is an integral part of my "davening uniform", having even a chintzy tallis does something other than beautify the mitzvah, it enhances the mitzvah.

This difference -- beautification vs enhancement -- is even more apparent when it comes to the mitzvah of sukkah.  On the one hand, I have a mitzvah of sukkah.  On the other hand, the mitzvah of sukkah is תשבו כעין תדורו/live there as you live in your home the rest of the year.  I have two cool examples.

Part of making a sukkah is to decorate it; the decorations are called נוי סוכה.  After all, I decorate my home, so I should decorate my sukkah.  נוי סוכה is such an integral part of the observance of sukkah, that the נוי סוכה are muktzah on Shabbos and Yom Tov.  R' Moshe, though, says that a decoration only merits the title נוי סוכה if it is something with which you would actually decorate your house.  Obviously pictures and posters count in that.  But even fruit counts, says R' Moshe, in explaining the p'sak of the Shulchan Aruch.  Why?  Because the only reason you don't decorate your house with fruit is that it doesn't age well.  Since you will only be residing in your sukkah for a week or so, the fruit will be just fine.  R' Moshe doesn't give an example of non-נוי סוכה decorations, but I think paper chains qualify.  That's a big help, since we all have little paper chainlettes all over the floor of our sukkah after the first rain.  If they were נוי סוכה, then they'd be muktzah and have to remain there all Shabbos and Yom Tov.

Here's another example: The Mishna Brura notes in sk 16 of siman 639 that eating a danish with coffee in the sukkah is certainly enough of an eating event to require sukkah and one should make the bracha of לישב בסוכה.  Yes, yes -- he affirms -- even though it is not enough to be in the category of being קובע סעודה that would require one to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch.  On the other hand, in sk 22 the same Mishna Brura says that you don't need to eat in a Sukkah after the first day -- even on Shabbos when you must eat enough bread to be קובע סעודה; as long as you eat only an olive's worth and less than an egg's worth, you would not require sukkah and would not make the bracha of לישב בסוכה!  What's going on here?

R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (thank you, thank you, Dirshu) explains that in the case of Shabbos, the bread is required by Shabbos and not by Sukkos.  Therefore what?  According to what we have said before, this fits very nicely.  Having a danish and coffee in the morning is normal living, therefore sukkah is required by תשבו כעין תדורו; that is, it is an enhancement of the observance of Sukkos.  Eating a Shabbos meal, though, is something I would do anyway, whether or not I was home.  Therefore eating a small Shabbos meal in the sukkah is a nice thing to do, but not required; it is a beautification of the mitzvah because I am using my sukkah even when not required.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Sometimes a Food Loses Its Identity When It Loses Its Bracha; Sometimes It Doesn't

Let's start with a question: Why are We Allowed to Drink Coffee and Whiskey Made by Non-Jews?  Before you ask,"Why would I think that I shouldn't be able to drink whiskey and coffee made by non-Jews?", I'll tell you. Simple, we all know that Chazal made a decree -- known as בישול עכו''ם/bishul akim -- that particular foods cooked by non-Jews are forbidden.  There are basically two criteria that determines if a dish falls into this category:
Is not consumed raw.Fit for a royal banquet. Cooked carrots, therefore, are not a problem since they can be eaten raw (I actually prefer them that way).  Baked beans are find because the are not prestigious enough.  (For great synopsis of the laws, see the article on the Star-K site, FOOD FIT FOR A KING, by Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, shlita.)  There are lots of cool questions and details (baked potatoes are prestigious, does that make even potato chips and issue?) which are for another time.  Clearly, though, both coffee an…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…