Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Challah as תרומה... With a Twist

Now that you know much more about wheat and flour than you ever cared to know, here's one reaons that knowledge is important.  Rye bread is actually made from a mixture of rye and wheat flours (1:2.5 in one recipe I saw).  (And therefore?  I hear you wondering...)  Rye and wheat are not generally harvested at the same time of year; moreover, harvests are earlier in the southern part of the country (where it gets warmer sooner) than the north.  (Sigh... and therefore?)  Well, then, a bakery could very well end up making a rye bread dough that is about 30% rye from last year and 70% what from this year.  (Please have mercy... and therefore what, for crying out loud?)

So here's what: Challah is a kind of תרומה.  When you have stuff that requires תרומה to be taken, it is considered a forbidden food until you actually separate a small portion as תרומה.  That small portion of תרומה can only be eaten by a Cohein (though we don't do that now-a-days; don't worry about that now).  The rest of the food is now permitted to all of us.  You don't need to take a piece of every apple, obviously; you just take a bit from a pile of apples.  You can even take a small portion of תרומה on one pile of apples and have that work for another pile of apples -- provided, however, that both piles are from the same year.  (Ah... light is dawning... rye and wheat are from different years...)

Challah is weird, though, because the requirement of challah is on dough, and even then only if you have enough dough.  So... let's say you have exactly a shiur (call it 5 lbs, just for argument's sake) of rye bread dough.  On the one hand, we could say that we only have 1.5 lbs of rye and 3.5 lbs of wheat -- both below the shiur of challah -- so we don't need to take challah at all.  On the other hand, we have 5 lbs of dough -- which is the requisite shiur -- so challah needs to be taken, but now I have the issue of flours from two different years.  If it is, then I have two possible solutions: (1) I could make a shiur of rye dough and another shiur or wheat dough and take challah from each of those on the appropriate parts of my original dough.  (2) If the is rye בטול/nullified in the wheat, I can take challah from my dough?

Surprise!  It's a machlokes Rashi and Tosefos.  At issue is how does ביטול actually work?  Rashi says that once something is ביטול, it has completely lost its own identity.  According to Rashi, then, it seems that we have 5 lbs of wheat dough.  According to Tosefos, something that is ביטול no longer counts, but it doesn't lose its identity.  According to Tosefos, then, if you had a dough with 5 lbs of wheat flour and 4 lbs of rye (for our purposes we only need a majority), then you could take challah.  In our case, though, the rye is certainly בטול, but now we only have 3.5 lbs of dough -- below the shiur, so the only option you have is the make the other doughs [solution (1), above].  Isn't that cool?

What to do?  Good question.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc