Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Characterizing Food That Falls Under the Rubik בישול עכו''ם

I never really understood all the gun control brouhaha opposing registration of hand guns until I heard an NRA representative say, "The Second Amendment is not about deer hunting."  Ah... they understand that there is a constitutional right to keep a secret stash of guns in case government goes bad and they need to stage a revolution.  I didn't and don't agree with that stance, but I at least I can now understand why they claim registration is unconstitutional.  (I really, really don't want to get into a discussion of gun control; just noting a place where knowing the background really helped me.)

One of the decrees from Chazal is בישול עכו''ם/food cooked by a non-Jew.  It's not about kashrus.  Proof: if that were the problem, we wouldn't need a decree; we are already not allowed to eat non-kosher food.  The decree of בישול עכו''ם is a barrier to intermarriage, plain and simple.  To that end, Chazal only included certain kinds of foods under the prohibition.  Namely: Only foods that are not eaten raw and are עולה על שלחן מלכים/fit for a royal table.  Nowadays we generally substitute "formal state dinner" for "royal table"  (see end, though).

While there is some discussion about the "eaten raw" requirement -- eaten raw where produced, but not where consumed, for example -- that requirement is usually straightforward.  More interesting is the requirement of "fit for a king's table".  Obviously you are going to find corn flakes at a state dinner, but you might find corn on the cob.  R' Cohen from the CRC breaks the question into three basic categories:

  1. same food and prep, just not done professionally
  2. same basic food, similar prep
  3. same basic ingredient, prepared completely differently
Category (1) would include an unprofessionally cooked baked potato.  I haven't eaten at McDonald's in some years, but I think you might be able to get a baked potato there (at least in California).  That potato (if, indeed, it exists) is certainly not cooked as well nor served as classily (is that a word?) as you get at your standard wedding.  Most agree that the professionalism/quality of the preparation is irrelevant.  Therefore you have another reason not to buy lunch there; whatever other issues exist with those potatoes, they are also forbidden because of בישול עכו''ם.

Category (2) would include potato chips and french fries.  Let's say, for argument's sake, that there are fried potato recipes (latkes!) that are appropriate for a state dinner.  Now, you are never going to find potato chips and french fries at a state dinner, but they are prepared essentially the same was as something that is appropriate for a state dinner.  In that case the poskim are split, many being lenient.  If you want to be stringent, though, you'd have to start looking for "heimische" potato chips.  There is another reason to be lenient on chips, btw, according to the Star-K... potato chips are not usually not eaten with a meal and are one of the quintessential junk foods.  Check out the Star-K summary on בישול עכו''ם for more details.  So, go ahead, eat your Jays.

Then there is category (3), to which almost all poskim agree that בישול עכו''ם doesn't apply.  For example, while you might be very happy to be served a grilled Tuna steak at a formal dinner, steamed Tuna chunks are very, very unlikely to make it to that table.  Good thing; since that's basically canned tuna.  Again, there are heimische brands that proudly declare בישול ישראל; now you know why.

One interesting historical note.  There is a question in the heintege poskim [I would say "modern", but (a), heintege sounds more frum; (b) you think gun control is fodder for raised ire, just try stepping into the "modern orthodox" fray!] about whether עולה על שלחן מלכים refers to a state dinner or even to what the king has at a weekend BBQ.  Interesting, R' Cohen said this question doesn't even appear until quite recently; certainly last 40 years or so.  I am wondering if it is because earlier than that kings and leaders didn't eat differently on a weekend than that ate at a formal dinner.  They viewed themselves as kings and leaders, not common folk who dress up as kings and leaders.  Personally, I think that is a loss for all of us... but I don't have time/space today to add another thought...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…