Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Bracha Before Torah/Bracha After Eating

One of my favorite songs/ditties of all time is, There's a Hole in the Bucket, Dear Liza, Dear Liza.  The back story is that Liza needs some water from the river and makes that request of husband, Henry.  Henry notes, with love and respect, "There's a hole in the bucket; dear Liza, dear Liza."  Liza, not realizing that Henry has already thought this through, makes what she feels is a perfectly reasonable suggestion, "So fix it; dear Henry, dear Henry."  Henry, realizing that Liza has not followed that to its logical conclusion and wanting to share the joy of discovery with her, gently guides Liza through his logic: need straw, straw is too long, knife is too dull to cut, the whetstone is too dry, need water from the river... there's a hold in the bucket.  The song ends there and I feel that Henry has been exonerated.  Others are less charitable and mumble things like, "Good grief; another stupid man."

The gemara (Brachos 21a) makes an observation that seems to also be chasing its tail.  R' Yehuda notes that we have an explicit verse revealing to us that the Torah requires us to make a bracha after eating; we similarly have a (different) verse that reveals to use that the Torah requires us to make a bracha before learning Torah.  (Everyone agrees with R' Yehuda on the first point, but there is some discussion about the second point.)  Then R' Yochanan and says, "Hey!  I can prove even more!  There is also a Torah obligation to make a bracha before eating and also after learning Torah!"  (My exclamation points, but I am sure he was excited with this find.)  How does R' Yochanan know?  Easy: Food does not require a bracha before, but does require a bracha afterwards.  Therefore learning Torah, which does require a bracha before, all the more so must require a bracha afterwards! [ok, but you said you are going to prove that food does require a bracha beforehand...]  Moreover, Torah does not require a bracha afterwards [hang on... you just said it did!], but does require a bracha, therefore food, which does require a bracha afterwards, all the more so must require a bracha before!  [but you just proved you know that making a bracha after learning Torah is required specifically because food does not require a bracha before!]

Rashi explains that when R' Yochanan says "Food does not require a bracha before", he means, "Food, which the Torah does not explicitly say that a bracha is required before".  Similarly for the bracha after Torah.  In other words, R' Yochanan is drawing a distinction between obligations that are revealed by explicit statement and obligations that are revealed by logical inference.  Fine; except... what's the difference?  At the end of the day a Torah obligation is a Torah obligation.

I think R' Yochanan is bringing out a subtle point: there is nothing logical about a logical inference.  That is, the Torah could have just as well written a bracha before eating and a bracha after learning; R' Yochanan would have been able to make the same argument.  R' Yochanan is using a principle known as קל וחומר, or (in Latin) a foriori, or (in English) "all the more so", or (in Math) "if a > b and b > c, then a > c".  We usually think of קל וחומר as so fundamental that it (chas v'shalom) is just as fundamental as the Torah itself.  R' Yochanan demonstrates that the concept of קל וחומר is not at all fundamental; it too has Torah specified rules and application.

There is only one who is more fundamental than the Torah, and that is the One.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…