Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Paying Creditors From an Estate and/or After Bankruptcy

Let's say Moe has died; baruch dayan ha'emes.  Moe had a beautiful funeral, lovingly and (of course) tearfully remembered by friends and loved ones.  In fact, there were three attendees -- Larry, Curly Joe, and Shemp -- who were weeping somewhat more than the rest of the gathered assemblage.  It is now a few days later and finances need to be settled.  As it turns out Moe had owed money to Larry, Curly Joe, and Shemp; ah, that explains why they were at the funeral.  Moe's estate is valued at $3000, Shemp is owed $10,000, Curly Joe is owed $20,000, and Larry is owed $30,000; ah, that explains the excess weeping.  How do we divide up the estate to pay the creditors?
Note: we are taking the case here where all notes have the same due date and we are not discussing the difference in whether paid in real estate or cash.
The answer is based on a mishna (K'subos 93a): A man who had three wives died.  (It doesn't discuss the cause of death, but I think it's pretty obvious.)  One wife is owed one manah (a unit of currency in talmudic times), the second wife was owed two mannah, and the third three.  The mishna says they split it evenly.
Background: as part of the Orthodox Jewish marriage, the man gives his wife a contract (known as a k'suva) that spells out his monetary, emotional, and physical obligations to his wife; it also spells out his (or his estate's) financial obligations to her in the case of divorce or death.
 That is the source for how creditors are paid from an estate.  The rub, as they say, is how to interpret "evenly".  There are two main opinions.  Rashi says evenly means what it says, each gets an equal portion of the estate.  In our example, Shemp, Curly Joe, and Larry will each get $1000.  Tosefos calls "foul!" -- that just can't be fair.  Tosefos, therefore, brings the opinion of Rabeinu Chananel who says "evenly" means "equal percentage based on the debt owed."  In our case, the total debt owed by Moe's (alav ha'shalom) estate is $60,000.  Shemp is owed 1/6 of the total debt, Curly Joe 1/3, and Larry is owed 1/2.  Therefore, Shemp will get $500, Curly Joe $1000, and Larry $1,500.

What about if Larry actually had three separate notes?  Do we split the estate according to the creditors or according to the notes?  According to Rabeinu Chananel it doesn't matter, but according to Rashi it makes a big difference. If we split according to the creditors, the split is as outlined.  If we split, though, according to the number of notes, we have five noteshere.  Therefore Shemp and Curly Joe (who each have one note) will get $600 each; Larry, though, will get $1800.  The logic of the second opinion is, "And just why do you think he made Moe, alav ha'shalom, sign three notes?  Precisely in order to be sure he got paid on each as a separate obligation, of course!"

There are a few cases where we don't pay evenly.  One such case is where one creditor is wealthy and the other is destitute, the one with no visible means of support is paid first.  That's the thing about Torah Law -- very strict, very fair.  It can be that way because it's not a consensus of opinion -- it is rather the Opinion of The One.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…