Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Using Distance to Come Closer to HaShem

This is even more self-serving than usual; math!  R' Moshe was once confronted by two parents who wanted to have their son continue on to college instead of beis medrash.  The father was a math professor and a bit of a talmid chacham, so he decided to play his strengths.  The father noted that Chazal tell us that a person is created by three partners: the mother (who contributes the red), the father (who contributes the white), and HaShem (who contributes the soul).  (NB: Before you ask... I have know idea what that means.)  The father further noted that in case of disagreement, we take a vote and follow the majority opinion.  Therefore, concluded the father: "I agree that HaShem wants my son to continue in beis medrash, but his mother and I want him to go to college.  That's ⅔ for college, ⅓ for yeshiva; so the boy should go to college."

I am sure the father had spent hours if not days preparing his arguments.  R' Moshe replied, without missing a beat, that he agreed with the logic of the argument, but that the father had gotten his math wrong.  "You and your wife were also created by three partners.   ⅓ of you, which is 1/9 is HaShem; who, as you say, obviously wants the bochur to continue in yeshiva. Similarly for your wife. That makes the total ⅔ + 2 × 1/9 = 5/9; so the bochur should continue in yeshiva."

Cool, eh?  Of course, R' Moshe had what he needed, so that's the end of the story.  I, however, started thinking... but the grandparents are also a partnership of three, and their parents, and so on and so on back to Adam and Chava.  I'll leave it as an exercise of the interested reader, but the series can be summed exactly.  Basically, for you more interested readers, its and infinite sum minus a remainder term that is essentially (2/3)^(number of generations since Adam & Chava) plus HaShem's initial contribution (no partners!).  For those of you who are less interested, here's the answer: 1; exactly one -- ein od milvado/there is none besides Him.

What about all those parents and parents of parents?  When the contribution from HaShem is added up, one is left only with something that doesn't even fit on the number line; which goes by the name of infinitesimal.  An infinitesimal has no value, it's just smaller than every number (except, of course, zero).  That infinitesimal is what R' Dessler calls the "shadow of a shadow" that was the only thing that separated Adam from his Creator.  Adam had only to recognize that, and we'd all be in Gan Eden now.  Instead, Adam chose to put some additional distance between himself and HaShem in order to be able to return to his King as a ba'al t'shuva.

Adam failed because, though he was very close to HaShem and extremely great, he had no experience with the yeitzer ha'rah/the evil inclination.  We, to our shame, have much experience with the yeitzer ha'rah.  However, that experience has made us better equipped to fight it.  Each generation is a bit further away, but that very distance weakens the yeitzer ha'rah and gives us more experience with fighting him.  We look inside and find Him among the remainder.  Then we look inside the remainder and find Him again.  Then the remainder of the remainder, and so on and so on, till we are back where we were when first created; just an infinitesimal barrier.  Precisely the place we were originally, but this time with lifetimes of experience with being separated and a longing for closeness.

This Tisha b'Av, as we cry and feel more keenly than ever the separation, as we long more fervently than ever for re-unification, we take another step toward the g'ula shleima.  A long journey, to be sure, but one that has an end.  Maybe this year, im yirtzeh HaShem?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc