Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Torah Needs To Be Yours, Not Just "In Your Hand"

Pirkei Avos is at the same time one of the most accessible tractate of mishnayos and at the same time most enigmatic.  That makes  a lot of sense, as it is all about hashkafa.  One of the most important milestones in my life was realizing how important it is to have a proper frame of reference.

Many of us have had the experience of sitting on a train at the station, watching the train on the adjacent tracks get more distant, and not being able to discern if you or the other train is the one moving.  Things get more complicated when you are not moving in a straight line.  For example, when riding a merry go round, one seems to feel an outward force (know as the centrifugal force), when in actuality the only force acting on you is the frictional force keeping you from continuing in a straight line.  The centrifugal force is an artifact (known in physics as pseudo force) that is due to you making your observations from an accelerating frame of reference.  (Oh.. wait!  This isn't a physics lecture, is it?  How embarrassing!)

The situation is all the more complex when trying to view reality from a Torah (ie, True) perspective while making our observations from a western (ie,crazy) frame of reference.  Pirkei Avos is therefore crucial to the newly observant.  On the other hand, it is also crucial for continuing development as are insights mature and deepen, our perspective also need fine tuning (and sometimes a complete overhaul).

One mishna that has bothered me for years (and probably decades) is 3:15:
Rabbi Elazar of Modiim said: One who is not careful with kodshim, belittles the importance chol ha'mo'ed, shames another Jew in public, treats the covenant of Abraham our father as nothing special, and teaches meanings in the Torah which are not in accord with halachah -- even though he has in his hand Torah and ma'asim tovim -- has no share in olam habah.
Two things bothered me.  First, even though he has Torah and ma'asim tovim, no share in olam habah?!  What happened to mi'toch sh'lo lishma ba lishma (doing things with an ulterior motive brings one to a level of doing things completely l'sheim shamayim)?  Second (after some maturity) I wondered even more, how is it possible that someone with Torah and ma'asim tovim can have those attitudes?

As I processed that depth of R' Shmuel Engel's p'shat in the angels claiming ownership of the Torah in shamayim because of the din of bar metzra, and Moshe Rabanu's response that Torah is for us human beings a matter of life and death, the answer to both questions became chillingly clear.  The Tanna is ever so precise with his words.  The one with this bad attitude and no portion in olam habah has Torah and ma'asim tovim in his hand!  He has not incorporated Torah into himself at all.  Since he is treating the Torah as simply a luxury (intellectually stimulating and all that), then the din of bar metzra returns; the Torah is not his at all, but remains in heaven.  Since he has not connected himself to the Torah, of course he has not portion in olam habah!  He is like an astronaut that is carrying his space suit in his hand; he can only exist in the spaceship, but can never venture into the vast reality that lays waiting for him.

HaShem!  Sein chelkeinu b'torasecha!  Please grant us our portion in your Torah!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק