Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Halacha and Kabalas haTorah

So... you go to your local Jewish book store to get a new Shabbos yarmulka.  How do you actually acquire it?  Here is a hint: movable objects (as opposed to land, for example) can not be acquired with money.  They way you acquire your beautiful new Shabbos yarmulka is by picking it up.  Please don't run out right now to pick up a new yarmulka and expect to call out to the owner as you leave, "Michael Allen told me it was ok." It is true that the acquisition (ie, transfer of ownership) only happens when you lift your item, but the transfer will only happen if the current owner (or his agent) wants to transfer ownership to you.  The usual way to get him to want to transfer ownership to you, of course, is to give him money.

Just to be complete.  You give him money, he accepts the money, writes a receipt, has said receipt signed by two kosher witnesses, hands you the yarmulka, you take it and lift it at least one tefach.  At that point the yarmulka is now yours; Mazal Tov!  Even if he would now claim that his intent to transfer ownership to you was insincere, the sale is still good.  We say that his intent to transfer ownership to you was sincere at the time of the sale (as evidenced by the receipt and the fact that he took you money).  That's the usual case.  You know very well by this time in our relationship that exceptions are coming up.

Suppose he doesn't want to sell that particular yarmulka to you. Maybe he promised it to another customer.  Maybe he doesn't like selling yarmulkas on Thursdays.  You, however, really want that yarmulka a lot.  So you hang him by this thumbs till he accedes.  You cut him down and give him money and ... and ... you lift it at least one tefach.  It's a good sale.  What about the fact that he was pressured in to the sale?  There are lots of pressures: financial and being hung up by your thumbs just to name two.  (I absolutely am not making this stuff up; this is all Chazal.)

If, however, the seller tells the witnesses to the receipt that he was coerced, then the sale is not a good sale.  The fact that there was an announcement of the coercion can be used by the seller nullify the sale.  Unless the coercion was at gun point (according to some opinions).  When being threatened, then we say the intent to transfer ownership is quite sincere.  At gun point one is not having second thoughts; he very sincerely wants to remain in this world.

All of this is relevant to any situation of accepting the terms of a document.  Which is how this came up: Klal Yisrael was coerced by having a mountain over their heads and being told, "If you accept My Torah, good; if not, this is your grave."  So they said "na'ase v'nishma".  As we all know, because of that coercion, the Torah had to be re-accepted a 1,000 years later at the time of Mordechai and Esther with the famous statement, "kiblu v'kimu".  However, asks the Kesef Mishna, according to those who hold that coercion at gun point (or, in this case, mountain base) is a good acceptance; why did we need a new acceptance?

There is much to say on that.  For now, though, it think it is worth noting that sages throughout the centuries have debated this issue because there is a deep and unwavering principle: HaShem also follows halacha.  HaShem is pretty free and easy with physical law when the need arises, but not halacha.  Halacha is obviously not merely a bunch of rules; halacha is the guiding force in all aspects of reality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…