Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Talking to HaShem/Talking About HaShem

When I was first told I needed to call R' Fuerst, my first question was, "What?  Just call this rabbi out of the blue?  Isn't he going to find that strange?!"  I know, I know... how many ways can you say "naive"?  Besides not knowing that people called R' Fuerst all the time, I also had no clue about protocol.  In fact, I had been talking to R' Fuerst (as well as many other rabai'im) for years before I learned that one is really supposed to use third person when addressing a rav.  It is still very strange for me to refer to R' Fuerst in third person (eg, "May I ask the rav a question?", "How is the rav today?", etc) and I am only partially successful.

The objective, of course, is to remember that one is not just asking a knowledgeable person his opinion.  Rather, one is asking a representative of HaShem Yisbarach about how to understand some issue that affects one's eternal soul.  That makes the formula for blessings double quizzical.  First, we address HaShem directly in second person, "Baruch atah"/"Blessed are You".  But we immediately transition to third person. "asher kidishanu"/"who has sanctified us"; not, as you might expect, "kidashtanu"/"You have sanctified us".  So we have an interesting couple of stiros (contradictions).  First, halachah dictates that we address the representative of HaShem in third person, but HaShem Himself we go for the direct approach.  Second, once we started addressing HaShem in second person, why do we jump back to third person?

On the first question, the problem is that we might put a talmid chocham in the same category as a college professor/doctor/other professional.  That is, I might think, "he knows halacha and I know halacha, he just happens to know more than me, so I'll ask his advise."  Halacha therefore dictates an enforced distance so that we will keep in the forefront of our mind that we are actually addressing  a representative of the Author of Reality.  We don't need such a reminder when addressing the Creator Himself, of course.... but then why switch to third person?

The Mabit (building on the Rashba) says we begin with second person to remind ourselves that there are no intermediaries between us and HaShem; this is a very personal and intimate relationship.  We switch to third person for two reasons.  First, we are finite beings addresses the Infinite.  We have to know that our understanding of HaShem is very limited and, in fact, we only know HaShem by how He chooses to reveal Himself; we have no actual direct knowledge.  Second, we really are not worthy/capable of addressing HaShem; it is only through the mitzos (asher kidishanu) that we transform ourselves into a being capable of having a relationship with the Infinite.

That second aspect points to the love HaShem has for us.  Even though we are not capable of having a relationship in our current state, HaShem gave us -- His am s'gula/treasured nation -- Torah and Mitzvos to transform us.  Even though we are not there yet, He still asks us to address Him directly.

And you thought you were just saying a bracha.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…