Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Talking to HaShem/Talking About HaShem

When I was first told I needed to call R' Fuerst, my first question was, "What?  Just call this rabbi out of the blue?  Isn't he going to find that strange?!"  I know, I know... how many ways can you say "naive"?  Besides not knowing that people called R' Fuerst all the time, I also had no clue about protocol.  In fact, I had been talking to R' Fuerst (as well as many other rabai'im) for years before I learned that one is really supposed to use third person when addressing a rav.  It is still very strange for me to refer to R' Fuerst in third person (eg, "May I ask the rav a question?", "How is the rav today?", etc) and I am only partially successful.

The objective, of course, is to remember that one is not just asking a knowledgeable person his opinion.  Rather, one is asking a representative of HaShem Yisbarach about how to understand some issue that affects one's eternal soul.  That makes the formula for blessings double quizzical.  First, we address HaShem directly in second person, "Baruch atah"/"Blessed are You".  But we immediately transition to third person. "asher kidishanu"/"who has sanctified us"; not, as you might expect, "kidashtanu"/"You have sanctified us".  So we have an interesting couple of stiros (contradictions).  First, halachah dictates that we address the representative of HaShem in third person, but HaShem Himself we go for the direct approach.  Second, once we started addressing HaShem in second person, why do we jump back to third person?

On the first question, the problem is that we might put a talmid chocham in the same category as a college professor/doctor/other professional.  That is, I might think, "he knows halacha and I know halacha, he just happens to know more than me, so I'll ask his advise."  Halacha therefore dictates an enforced distance so that we will keep in the forefront of our mind that we are actually addressing  a representative of the Author of Reality.  We don't need such a reminder when addressing the Creator Himself, of course.... but then why switch to third person?

The Mabit (building on the Rashba) says we begin with second person to remind ourselves that there are no intermediaries between us and HaShem; this is a very personal and intimate relationship.  We switch to third person for two reasons.  First, we are finite beings addresses the Infinite.  We have to know that our understanding of HaShem is very limited and, in fact, we only know HaShem by how He chooses to reveal Himself; we have no actual direct knowledge.  Second, we really are not worthy/capable of addressing HaShem; it is only through the mitzos (asher kidishanu) that we transform ourselves into a being capable of having a relationship with the Infinite.

That second aspect points to the love HaShem has for us.  Even though we are not capable of having a relationship in our current state, HaShem gave us -- His am s'gula/treasured nation -- Torah and Mitzvos to transform us.  Even though we are not there yet, He still asks us to address Him directly.

And you thought you were just saying a bracha.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…