Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Bracha is for Material Success

I proposed a novel explanation (chidush, if you will) for Yitchak Avinu's reticence in giving Eisav a bracha after having given Yaakov Avinu the seven brachos that Yitchak Avinu had originally intended for Eisav.  The chidush was based loosely on a fun gematria, but required that a bracha should be understood as relating to material success.  That makes sense for a few reasons.  First, Chazal say that "kol bi'dai shamayim chutz mi'yiras shamayim" (everything is in the hands of heaven except for fear of heaven), so it should not be in the hands of a human blesser to affect the spiritual success of the blessee.  I mean, if HaShem is taking His celestial and eternal hands off that, I am guessing that even the avos didn't get to put there hands into that either.  Also, Chazal say that bracha operates on thing hidden from the eye; that obviously means physical, because the spiritual is always hidden from the eye.  There is more like that, but I didn't have anything definitive.

The key word there is "didn't"; past tense.  I saw a fascinating Mishna Brura that, I believe, really cinches things.  The Shulcha Aruch OC 128:25 discusses how to handle birkas kohanim in a shul that has only kohanim (I've never been in such a minyan, of course, though vaskin in Chicago is pretty darn close).  The Shulchan Aruch says that if you only have 10 total, then everyone goes up to duchan.  Who are they blessing?  Those working in the field.  Who will answer "amein"?  The women and children in shul.  Why not say they are blessing the women and children?  Says the Mishna Brura: the women and children in shul is not enough of a reason to give a blessing.  Hang on!  Hang on!  Let me finish...

Suppose, on the other hand, there are more than 10 kohanim.  In that case only the "extra" kohanim should go up to duchan and leave 10 to answer "amein".  Says the Mishna Brura: even though having a single Yisrael would be enough of a reason for the blessing ceremony, having less than 10 kohanim is not enough of a reason to give a blessing.  The Mishna Brura uses the same words to explain why having no men at all in shul or less than 10 kohanim is not enough of a reason for the blessing!  So there you have it: the blessing is not primarily for women and children in shul, but for the men who are working in the fields to support them.  Neither is the blessing primarily for kohanim (who should be busy with the avoda in the beis hamikdash, may it be rebuilt soon and in our lifetime), but for the men who are working in the fields to support them.  In other words, the bracha in meant for success in material undertakings.

Pretty good, I think.  One problem, there is a kohain in the vasikin minyan who has been giving my trouble since he was a teenager.  Yehuda pointed out to me that there is a targum yonason that says that the birkas kohanim go on spiritual undertakings (at least the second bracha).  I am still going with my p'shat, but certainly need to investigate further.  Thanks, Yehuda.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…