Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Be Sure You Understand Just Who is Doing Whom the Favor

Nothing can quite make you feel as old as quoting a comic strip that is unknown to your listener. When I spoke to a group of college students, I knew better than to refer to Doonesbury (even though it is still around). I thought I was safe, though, with Dilbert. Nope. Sigh...

Anyway,  on strip that is spot has Alice, the female engineer, looking for a better position in the company. The rule in companies, by the way, is that when you want to promote an internal candidate to a new position, you often need to post it, just in case there are better qualified candidates than the one you want to promote. The idea is sound, but when the manager just words the requirements in such a way that only one person fits. In the Dilbert example, Alice reads the job description: near-sighted, has a red pickup truck, and answers to "Bob". Dilbert notes that "they probably have someone in mind"; Alice still contemplates if she could make it work. (I have seen -- and even written -- job descriptions that, without specifying eyesight, vehicle, nor "answers to", were just as targeted.)

In parashas Mishpatim, we are told (Shmos 22:24), "When you lend money to My people, to the poor person with you, you shall not behave toward him as a lender." Rashi notes the unusual phrase אֶת־הֶֽעָנִי֙ עִמָּ֔ךְ/"the poor person with you" and comments (quoting Tanchuma): look at yourself as if you were a poor person. Really? The Torah is here saying it doesn't want me to behave toward him as lender, that is, pressuring him to repay. But if the lender is himself poor, isn't he going to have more reason to put pressure on the borrower? After all, he wants to be a nice guy, but he also needs to feed his family. I would have expected the Torah to want me to feel wealthy, as if I didn't need the money; then I can let the borrower slide as long as he needs to.

So I looked around. The Kli Yakar has a lengthy piece on this verse, all worth learning; but I was on a mission and this part caught my eye (end of the fourth paragraph my print): The poor person is with you in that you are getting much more out of the deal than he is. Because you (the lender) need help; lots and lots of help. For whatever other reasons he needs to be lacking funds, one of the reasons that he has been impoverished, part of the Divine calculation is for you to get saved from the judgements of gehinom in the merit of giving him an interest free loan and not behaving toward him as a lender. The Kli Yakar says that part of the reason you are not allowed to take interest is simply because you are already making an incredible profit on this deal. The borrower is getting funds to help him manage in this world. In return, you -- the lender -- are getting infinite reward in the world to come and being saved from gehinom. You want to also make a few bucks on the side? Puleeze.

I think that is what Rashi (and the medrash Tanchuma) means: be real; the lender is really the one who is lacking. Appreciate that. Back to Alice... it is very tempting when you have funds to lend and are approached by someone in need to think, "Whew... good thing for him I am around!" Or, let's say you have some unique skills, oh... I don't know... say a Ph.D. in physics. It is so tempting to feel, "Wow! Good thing I am around; there is nobody around with all the skills needed for this position. They are so lucky." Yeah, right, Bob. Or someone wrote the job description to help you out and make sure you get the job, because you are the one who needs help and to be saved from the judgments of gehinom.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...