Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Pleasure of Learning Torah Is Literally Out of This World

When I learn Torah, I would say that more often than not I am filled with feelings of happy satisfaction and enjoyment. Yet there is an apparent machlokes between Chazal and every translation I can find for the word הנאה. Google translate says it quite well, I think:
הנאה
a feeling of happy satisfaction and enjoyment
And Chazal? We need a short introduction. There are only two brachos that are a Torah obligation: Birkas HaMazon and Birkas HaTorah: Rav Yehuda asks (rhetorically): How do we know there is a Torah obligation to make a bracha after eating? Because it says ואכלת ושבעת וברכת/(when) you eat and are satisfied, you will bless (Devarim 8:10). How do we know there is a Torah obligation to make a bracha before learning Torah? Because it says כי שם ה' אקרא הבו גדל לאלקינו/when I proclaim the name of HaShem, ascribe greatness to our G-d (Devarim 32:3) (Brachos 21a).

So far, so good. R' Yochanon floats the idea that he can prove that there should be a Torah obligation to say a bracha before eating from the Torah obligation to make a bracha before learning Torah. R' Yochanon also proposes that he can also prove that there should be a Torah obligation to make a bracha after learning from the fact that there is a Torah obligation to make a bracha after eating. For both he uses the classic, tried and true ling of reasoning known as a fortiori; better known as קל וחומר. Here we go: Food does not require a bracha beforehand, but does require a bracha afterward; is it not a logical consequence that Torah, which does require a bracha beforehand should certainly require a bracha afterwards. (I think you know where this is going...) Torah, which does not require a bracha afterwards, yet does require a bracha beforehand, is it not a logical consequence that food, which does require a bracha afterward should certainly require a bracha before.

You and I both know very that there is not bracha after learning Torah (well... maybe, but that is for another time) and we also both know very well that birkas HaMazon is a Torah obligations, but the brachos we make before eating are all Rabbinic obligations. No worries, the Gemara immediately "shlugs up" (I don't know a good translation for that expression) R' Yochanon's proofs; to wit:

How can you ask from Torah to food? Torah brings us to eternal life! Which implies that food does not bring us to eternal life. I am good with that. But the Gemara goes the other way also: How can you ask from food to Torah? After all, we have הנאה from food! By implication, there is no הנאה from Torah!
Find another/better answer to this question in this later TftD.

Clearly we need to adjust our understanding of הנאה. There is no question that learning Torah is accompanied by feelings of pleasure and satisfaction. Apparently, however, that is not what the Hebrew word הנאה means. We have to say that הנאה is a feeling of pleasure and satisfaction that comes from a physical/this world benefit. I would like to suggest, in fact, that this is precisely why the Torah obligates us in a bracha after eating and being satisfied. It may be fun to look forward to a good meal, but that's not הנאה. In fact, the real benefit of the food is only after having eaten and digested it. The taste? There and gone in moments.

So why do we need to make a bracha on Torah before learning? Couldn't one argue that the benefit is only after learning? Not at all. The benefit of learning Torah is the relationship one is making with the Creator. You need to know that before starting. You need to ascribe greatness to our G-d before you start proclaiming His name -- that is, learning, which is all expressions of the name of HaShem. If you don't, you are in real danger of missing the real benefit of Torah and being satisfied with the accompanying, and all too fleeting, feelings of pleasure and satisfaction in this world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction.  That is, even th

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo