Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Muktzeh -- It's a Spectrum

Let's do a quick rundown on מוקצה. The word מוקצה, of course, basically mean "set aside". There are things we set aside on Shabbos (and Yom Tov) because Shabbos is really, really important and violations are really, really bad. (That is my high level, executive summary of the Mishna Brura's introduction to siman 308.) Doing melacha on Shabbos is really bad. Also, Shabbos should be really, really special. (Yikes... talk about ירידת הדורות!) Since every Jew knows that, things that would bring one to violate the Shabbos or cheapen it's sanctity, are not at the forefront of our minds. There are, to one level or another, מוקצה.

Because over our history, there have been times when Klal Yisrael is not as careful with Shabbos as they should be, Chazal have baked some basic principles into practical halacha. There are essentially four levels of מוקצה:

  1. Holy Writ and food -- Not set aside at all, you can move them just cuz.
  2. Utensils whose main use is permitted on Shabbos; spoons, forks, and knives, for example. Toys that are not electric and don't make noise. You can move those if you have some reason -- even to save them from getting ruined. But not for no reason; not just cuz.
  3. Utensils whose main use is for something that is forbidden on Shabbos. Hammers, pens, scissors, etc. You can move those if you need the place they are occupying or if you need to use them for some permitted purpose (crack nuts with a hammer, open a bag of food with scissors, and the like).
  4. Non-utensils -- rocks, money, credit cards, etc. You are spending Shabbos with them right where they are; they have ultimate squatters rights.

Those are the basic categories. Surrounding that you have all sorts of fun stuff -- one object supporting another, muktzeh throughout twilight, dangerous muktzeh, all with oodles and gobs of cool details. Some of which I hope to discuss in another TftD. Also, these are not hard and fast boundaries; especially between (2) and (3). Imagine a nutcracker shaped like a little hammer; you could use it for tapping in small nails, but you probably wouldn't. Imagine a small hammer that you only use occasionally, but that you keep in a kitchen "junk drawer"; you might actually use that to crack nuts or help with stuck jar lids on a not infrequent basis. What if one family member uses it exclusively one way (that is permitted) and another uses it exclusively another (that is forbidden on Shabbos)? Is it used for lots of permitted tasks that take a few seconds each, but the forbidden tasks would take hours? So it really is a spectrum.

What about if a tool/utensil broke on or before Shabbos and it cannot no longer execute its designated/main purpose? For example, your hammer broke and the business end no longer has a handle? It could be used to crack nuts or to stop a door, but it is broken and it certainly was not a doorstop nor a nutcracker before it broke. Now what?

Don't worry... there will be more, בעזרת השם!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...