Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Real -- that is, Torah -- Golden Rule

I have read enough science fiction and seen enough horror films to have been really worried in recent days about an alien invasion. Anyone who has seen Westworld or Invasion of the Body Snatchers knows very well that an alien invasion can start with creatures who look very human, but they always have one give-away "tell". In this case, I have noticed quite a few very human looking creatures... but to the observant, paranoid, science nerd they made one glaring mistake in their charade: Everyone knows that human breathe through the nose and mouth. These creatures largely breathe through their chins, many have noses that are nothing more than clever camouflage. Some even breathe through their elbows! My evidence? Their mask usage.

Then I thought their might be another explanation.

They -- the "veldt" -- has what they call the Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. So inspirational! Our sages said something similar -- That which is hateful to you, don't do to your fellow (Shabbos 31a). Gawrsh.... it's ok, I guess... but why so negative? Basically the same thing, but just in the negative; you know how Jews are.

That's they way I always had heard it presented. Seems strange, though, that one of the greatest of our sages -- Hillel the Elder -- could not think of a better way to express "the whole of Torah." As it turns out, the Golden Rule ain't so golden; kinda manipulative and selfish, actually.  And Hillel wasn't telling us how to get along with other people, he was actually expressing our mission statement in the most actionable way possible.

Let's start with the so called "Golden" rule. Who is the focus of that statement? That's right, it you. The statement has the same semantic content as: I wanted to be treated nicely, so to get what I want -- which is to be treated nicely -- I'll treat you nicely. Their "Golden" rule is not altruistic, it's selfish. Let's say, for example, that I am (in my mind) not at risk for Covid-19; I am young and healthy, after all. Shoot... then I don't need to wear a mask! Why should I wear a mask? It's uncomfortable and I don't need you to wear a mask. Since I am only doing unto other what I care if they do to me; I can just bag the whole mask thing. I only care about me, and I am fine; so I don't need to even feign concern for you.

Hillel's statement, on the other hand, challenges you to take your own experiences and turn them into sensitivity and caring for others. Hillel says: take the hurt from your own experiences and turn that into sensitivity to help others. Our same fellow above now says to himself, "Yikes! I'd hate to even be put at risk for catching Covid-19; I am certainly going to wear a properly fitting mask to be sure I don't put anyone else at risk!" My experiences become the lessons I need to learn how to treat others.

Ah, so they aren't aliens... they just don't care. I guess we should call this epoch: Invasion of the Goyishe Kohps.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...