Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Erasing/Destroying Letters and Words on Shabbos

I am an amazing בעל עלייה/growing in spirituality daily in leaps and bounds.  Of course, like any בעל עלייה, I deny myself luxuries to show how serious I am.  My biggest sacrifice is that I eat candy only on Shabbos; and Yom Tov... and Chol HaMoed... and Rosh Chodesh... and Purim... and Chanuka... and the day before Yom Kippur.  Still, if you work that out, it means that I restrict my candy consumption to less than a third of the available time.  Impressive, no?  I thought about adding cookies and cakes to that list, but I don't want to get crazy with the my self-imposed restrictions.

There is one problem we have all experienced with eating cake (especially birthday cake) on Shabbos and Yom Tov; the problem with letters.  Any kosher bakery has a plentiful supply of plastic (or paper) mats on which they write "Happy Birthday/Anniversary/Mazal Tov/Bar/Bas Mitzvah Sprinza/Yaakov!" in cloyingly sweet frosting.  Why?  Because, as we all know, to destroy the words on Shabbos would be to transgress the מלאכה of erasing, as brought in the Shulchan Aruch, O, Ch. 340:3.  Baruch HaShem for plastic and parchment paper, so we can just lift off those problematic words and dig in to our cake unfettered by halachic boundaries.

Hang on, you may very well wonder... how do we eat OreoBloomeo's?  That's why you need to Mishna Brura, who explains (s.k. 15) that we need only be concerned about words that we added onto the cake (ie, written in frosting and the like).  Words that are actually baked into the cake itself is not called "written" and therefore the craft of "erasing" is not relevant.  (Somewhat off topic: that's also why you are allowed to walk on soft dirt with shoes that have writing on the bottom... the words impressed into the ground are not called written.)  That is also why you can eat your Hershey bar; they letters are not written on the chocolate, but are just part of the mold.

But wait!  What about M&Ms and Jelly Belly's?  Those actually have letters written on them.  (You notice these things when your restrictions increase their importance; and my candy is almost as important to me as my beer.)  And don't try to pull that same Mishna Brura on me that continues to say "you also needn't be stringent about words formed on the cake with honey", because there the intent is that they honey gets absorbed into and becomes part of the cake.  Also don't try the old פסיק רישא דלא ניחא ליה trick.  While it is true that the Shulchan Aruch holds that פסיק רישא דלא ניחא ליה is only forbidden for Torah prohibitions and this kind of erasing is certainly only Rabbinic in nature.  If you are S'fardi, ok; but that's not going to help us Ashkenazim who follow the Rema who holds that פסיק רישא דלא ניחא ליה is forbidden even for Rabbinic prohibitions.  Now what?

So... there are many halachic authorities who say that the Rema is only strict if it is single reason that knocks the prohibition from Torah down to Rabbinic; but if there are two or more, then he is fine with it.  What do we have in this case?  The erasure is:

  1. destructive; it is not being done to enable writing (or even to beautify)
  2. it is not the normal way of erasing
  3. it is actually part of the eating process
  4. I have no intention for the erasure
  5. it's not being done for the sake of the erasure  (doesn't help according to the Rambam)
So we are at least five steps away from the Torah prohibition.  Still... even though it is not technically forbidden; is it the right thing to do?  The Mishna Brura helps with a reason buried in a Sha'ar Tziyun -- it enhances one's Shabbos experience; aka עונג שבת (which Google, interestingly, translates simply as "Shabbos")  עונג שבת, of course, never permits something forbidden, but it does often affect the way we conduct ourselves with those actions that are permissible.

Whew!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...
Post a Comment
Read more