Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Maris Ayin vs L'zus S'fasayim


Maris Ayin is a technical halachic term that gets lots of sloppy abuse.  Maris ayin (it appears to the observer) can be a factor in determining halacha, but only where Chazal used it that way.  For example, wearing a signet ring is patur aval assur according to some because the viewer may think that one is wearing the ring as a subterfuge to be able to use the seal.  The Halichos Shlomo in Yom Kippur brings two halachos regarding shoes that seem to contradict each other, but actually very neatly show when maris ayin just doesn't apply and when it could apply.
  1. One who has a heter to wear leather shoes on Yom Kippur (for whatever reason; sores on his feet, for example) may wear them with impunity; in full view of any and all.  No maris ayin here!  (You may want to be a bit circumspect because of l'zus s'fasayim/crooked lips, ie, slander; but that is personal taste.)
  2. One may not wear simulated leather shoes in Yom Kippur because of maris ayin.  Even at home alone in your sealed room, no dice and no simulated leather shoes.
What's the difference?  After all, in both cases the perpetrator is doing something permissible; but people could make a mistake and think they are doing something wrong.  Maris Ayin, says the Halichos Shlomo, is applied only when someone is doing something that is 100% permissible, but it looks like something that is forbidden.  Drinking fish blood is another example.  (Yum, eh?)  Exercising a heter, however, is not maris ayin.

His proof is fascinating.  Whenever something is forbidden because of maris ayin, it is forbidden "afilu b'chadrei chadarim"/even in the inner chambers; ie, even when there is no possibility of observation. 
Important aside: This is an important rule that has application all over halacha: once something is determined to be forbidden, the actual reasons that went into that decision are not usually relevant to the application of the issur.  The fact that it was forbidden because of what people will think does not mean you can ignore the issur just because there is no possibility of observation.
If one is permitted to due something that is usually assur because of circumstances, however, then one need not publicize it -- even if it is something usually done in inner chambers.  For example, cooking on Shabbos for a choleh sh'yeish bo sakana/a deathly ill patient is permitted and one need not make any special efforts to publicize ones actions and their reason.  That is, the action is permitted even in inner chambers and therefore it cannot be a case of maris ayin.

By the way, Halichos Shlomo also says that now a days the minhag is to wear very comfortable non-leather shoes on Yom Kippur; because, he says, we are all istanises (loose translation: spoiled brats) today.  He pretty much calls 'em like he sees 'em.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...
Post a Comment
Read more