Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Maris Ayin vs L'zus S'fasayim


Maris Ayin is a technical halachic term that gets lots of sloppy abuse.  Maris ayin (it appears to the observer) can be a factor in determining halacha, but only where Chazal used it that way.  For example, wearing a signet ring is patur aval assur according to some because the viewer may think that one is wearing the ring as a subterfuge to be able to use the seal.  The Halichos Shlomo in Yom Kippur brings two halachos regarding shoes that seem to contradict each other, but actually very neatly show when maris ayin just doesn't apply and when it could apply.
  1. One who has a heter to wear leather shoes on Yom Kippur (for whatever reason; sores on his feet, for example) may wear them with impunity; in full view of any and all.  No maris ayin here!  (You may want to be a bit circumspect because of l'zus s'fasayim/crooked lips, ie, slander; but that is personal taste.)
  2. One may not wear simulated leather shoes in Yom Kippur because of maris ayin.  Even at home alone in your sealed room, no dice and no simulated leather shoes.
What's the difference?  After all, in both cases the perpetrator is doing something permissible; but people could make a mistake and think they are doing something wrong.  Maris Ayin, says the Halichos Shlomo, is applied only when someone is doing something that is 100% permissible, but it looks like something that is forbidden.  Drinking fish blood is another example.  (Yum, eh?)  Exercising a heter, however, is not maris ayin.

His proof is fascinating.  Whenever something is forbidden because of maris ayin, it is forbidden "afilu b'chadrei chadarim"/even in the inner chambers; ie, even when there is no possibility of observation. 
Important aside: This is an important rule that has application all over halacha: once something is determined to be forbidden, the actual reasons that went into that decision are not usually relevant to the application of the issur.  The fact that it was forbidden because of what people will think does not mean you can ignore the issur just because there is no possibility of observation.
If one is permitted to due something that is usually assur because of circumstances, however, then one need not publicize it -- even if it is something usually done in inner chambers.  For example, cooking on Shabbos for a choleh sh'yeish bo sakana/a deathly ill patient is permitted and one need not make any special efforts to publicize ones actions and their reason.  That is, the action is permitted even in inner chambers and therefore it cannot be a case of maris ayin.

By the way, Halichos Shlomo also says that now a days the minhag is to wear very comfortable non-leather shoes on Yom Kippur; because, he says, we are all istanises (loose translation: spoiled brats) today.  He pretty much calls 'em like he sees 'em.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...
Post a Comment
Read more