Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: A Kula in Brachos is a Chumra in Sukkos

Before benefiting from this world, one must make a bracha.  That, of course, is why we make a bracha  before eating.  So far so good.  One may ask, however, how much benefit are you allowed per bracha?  Obviously you don't need to make a new bracha every time you chew, even though you get additional enjoyment by the fresh flavor released.  Just as obviously, you can't make one bracha upon becoming a gadol and use that as carte blanche for the rest of your life.  Somewhere between those extremes the answer lies.

The basic answer is that the bracha covers a single eating adventure.  The adventure is usually ended amicably by deciding you are finished eating and (when appropriate) reciting the appropriate bracha acharona.  However, an eating event can be prematurely ended by "shinui makom" -- changing location.  The rules of how much change and for which kinds of events and foods are not trivial (shocking, eh?), but the guidelines are pretty simple.  If you abandon your place of eating, then your bracha rishona has expired and to eat more would require at least a new bracha rishona (and sometimes also a bracha acharona).  What is called "abandonment" is also not trivial, but again in broad strokes: snacks of foods that are eaten on the go (fruit, candies, drinks, etc) are easily abandoned, formal sit down meals are pretty hard to abandon, and snacks of foods that would qualify for "kiddush bimkom s'uda" occupy a middle ground.

To be more concrete, suppose you are drinking (one of) your morning coffee(s).  If you would step outside to get your mail or change the sprinkler, then you would need to make a new sh'ha'kol on your return to drinking.  On the other hand, if you were eating (one of) your morning danish(es) and were to step out, you would not need to make a new m'zonos; because there is more k'vi'us (you are more settled) when eating the danish.  Suppose you are drinking coffee with the danish?  Now you can step out and come back with no new brachos at all; the event is "danish with coffee", so they both have a k'vi'us.

Now comes sukkah.  A man is allowed to drink coffee outside the sukkah; it has no k'vi'us.  A danish, on the other hand, must be eaten in the sukkah.  It is going to come out, then, that if you are drinking coffee with a danish in the sukkah, that you would not be allowed to finish your coffee outside the sukkah.  Since the event was "coffee with danish", and that even has k'vi'us, the event must be completed inside the sukkah.  Even if you finished the danish, the coffee is still part of the initial event.

Isn't that a cool example of "wake up and smell the coffee"?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo