Skip to main content

Derech HaShem: 1.1 Belief in and about G-d

The Ramchal begins by making six points of belief that are vital to an understanding of G-d and the entire system:

  1. G-d exists; His existence precedes all and is eternal.
  2. We can never really know G-d Himself; that knowledge is beyond the capability of a created being.
  3. G-d exists perforce.  That is, the whole concept of existence only has meaning within the context of G-d.  In a sense, He precedes even existence itself.
  4. G-d does not depend on anything else, but everything else depends on Him.  He brings into being and constantly sustains everything.
  5. G-d is absolutely without parts or division.  When we speak of G-d's attributes (His knowledge, His mercy, His kindness), those are completely our perception and not something intrinsic to Him.  From G-d's point of view (so to speak), they are all one: Him.
  6. G-d is unique and cannot not even be described in terms of anything besides G-d Himself.
The importance and implications of (6) are discussed at some length in Da'as T'vunos.

Note I am using the term "G-d" (instead of HaShem, for example) to stress the point that anything that we can name (HaShem, Sha-kai, kel, etc) is itself a creation; it is a guise via which G-d chooses to interact with His creation, but not at all His true essence.  That is, each name we use is referring to a particular way in which G-d interacts with the world.  Some names can actually even be used to bring about "supernatural" effects, as the Ramchal discusses later (not "outside of the whole system", but "outside of teva/nature").  His true essence, however, is completely inaccessible to us.  We refer to that in shmone esrei at the end of modim when we say, "hatov shimcha, u'l'cha na'eh l'hodos" -- "Your name (ie, the way You present yourself in all of its guises) is good, and to You (ie, the unnameable and unfathomable true essence which is You) is appropriate to acknowledge/thank"  With that clarity, we'll stop ever asking "why did G-d do such and such" (because that is impossible for us to know); rather we will ask, "what am I to learn from the fact that G-d chose to do such and such".
Second, we know these things via nevua and mesora, but can be logically derived (according to the Ramchal).  We see here (again) the importance of nevua.  In this case, however, the mesora gives us the strength of conviction to know and stand behind (and up to) these ideas even when I can't derive them logically.  It is something like the belief in atoms.  I have (of course) never seen an atom (because they cannot actually be seen) and I may not even know the evidence or proof them their existence.  However, I have confidence in their existence because I know that the truth of their existence has been examined in a public forum and reviewed by experts in the field.  Here too (in fact even more so), I have no second thoughts about the veracity and importance of these idea.

Finally, we see from (4) that Orthodox/Torah Judaism is not really a religion.  Judaism are not about inspiration, or how spirituality fits into your life, or why bad things happen to good people.  Rather it is an all encompassing knowledge and understanding of all reality.  You can't really ask if questions like, "Is G-d good" because there is no external scale of "good/bad" by which to judge  or even measure Him.  He simply "is", and everything else -- us, good/evil, Coca-Cola -- is nothing but and expression of His will.  The Torah is the blueprint for creation and HaShem has not only allowed us but actually invited us to participate in His magnum opus: Reality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...