Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Honest Mistake in Giving/Receiving a Gift

I know, I know... you are super excited about your new understanding of how ownership is transferred.  Still, though, you are thinking that you mostly buy groceries and books without mishap and you don't feel close enough to death's door to worry just now about to protect a loved one from greedy heirs.  You express a wistful sigh... if only there was a more practical example... and one that didn't involve money... and between people who just want to do the right thing but also really want the transaction to be decided their way... if only... if only...

By George; you are in luck!  Shmuel was renovating his home study.  He bought new s'farim, updated some old ones (the wonder of laser printing!), and replaced his bookshelves.  It was beautiful.  Between the new and updated s'farim, he ended up with 10 s'farim that he no longer needed and didn't really fit in with the "feng shui" he was trying to achieve.  He put those s'farim in a box until he decided what to do with them.  Soon after, his friend Reuvein stopped by to say hello and Shmuel showed him around.  When Shmuel mentioned the extraneous s'farim, Reuvein asked if he could have them.  Shmuel is thrilled that his beloved s'farim have a good home.  Reuvein picks up the indicated box and starts to leave; only to return anon as it is now raining.  Reuvein asks Shmuel permission to leave the s'farim with Shmuel; Shmuel happily agrees; Shalom for all of Yisrael.

Reuvein returns the next day (now a bright and sunny) to bring home his new s'farim.  Shmuel, has a funny look on his face.  Shmuel relates that while moving the box out of the way, he noticed it felt heavier than he remembered.  He looked in the box and saw not 10, but 15 s'farim!  Oops; something is wrong, as he really had wanted to keep some of those s'farim.  Reuvein counters, though, that he had already acquired the s'farim; Shmuel had given them to him and he had lifted and pulled the box toward him.  There is no question, therefore, that Reuvein has performed מעשה קנין/an act that demonstrates his ownership of the property.  The only question, then, is what was Shmuel's precise intention?  There are three possibilities, and it depends on how we understand Shmuel's offer to give Reuvein that box of s'farim.

  1. Shmuel meant that box; he only mentioned that number of s'farim as ancillary information so Reuvein would have an idea of how much room he would need.
  2. Shmuel meant 10 s'farim; he only mentioned the box to let Reuvein know where they are.
  3. Shmuel meant the particular box in which he had specifically placed only the 10 s'farim that he meant to give away.

If Shmuel meant (1), then Reuvein has acquired the entire box of s'farim, regardless of contents.  If Shmuel meant (2), then Reuvein has only acquired the 10 of the s'farim in the box.  Case (3) is particularly interesting, because it means that Reuvein picked up the wrong box, and therefore his מעשה קנין is completely ineffective.  It is no different than picking up a blender at the appliance store before you have paid; the action could work, but the seller had no intention to sell.  That makes this case really interesting, because most of our rules about who has the upper hand in a monetary dispute revolve around who is the מוחזק/current possessor of the item in question.  Here, though, precisely who is the מוחזק is also a question.

The poskim tend to treat this like scenario (2) because it represents a compromise between the extreme positions of all or none.  Compromise is always good, but in this case we are more or less forced into that position because of the uncertainties.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…