Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: How, Precisely, Ownership is Transferred from One Party to Another

So you go the the fruit market to get an apple.  Just when does that apple officially become yours?  When you pick it up the fruit bin?  When you hand the money to the cashier?  When you take your apple back from the bagboy?  When you leave the store?

Who cares?  That's a perfectly reasonable question; so let's change the case.  You ordered a gizzy from an Gizzy's R Online, who dutifully charges your credit card and sends you a verification email that they have dropped your gizzy into the USPS postbox on the corner.  You wait a week, two weeks, a month... no gizzy.  You call and say it was never delivered; they offer their condolences, but say their responsibility ends once they drop it into the postbox.  (That actually happened to me.  I never got my gizzy nor did I ever order from them again.)

Of course I made the the case more complicated with sending via messenger and whatnot, but the principles are the same.  In fact, even in the original case, suppose the bagboy drops and steps on the apple.  Did he drop and step on your apple (good luck getting him to buy you another one), or did he drop and step on the store's apple?  As usual, in halacha we are not concerned about the size of the transaction, but on the principles involved.

A transaction always involves two parties: the מקנה/seller and the קונה/buyer.  (Please note that even though I am I am the words seller and buyer, this could equally apply to gifts; it is simply that there are no good English words that cover all cases.  I suppose I could have used "granter" and "accepter"; that that would have been annoying with no real gain in clarification.)  In order for a halachically bind transfer of ownership to occur, each has his part to play.  From the seller we need גמירת דעת/firm and unforced resolve to transfer the property to the buyer.  On the buyer's part we need some sort of physical demonstration that he has taken ownership.  (On caveat, it is possible to transfer ownership to someone even without their knowledge if it is a clear benefit to them; but that's another topic.)

Interestingly, there is no disagreement that the  גמירת דעת of the מקנה is mandated by the Torah; but there is a disagreement as to whether the physical demonstration of ownership on the part of the קונה is a Torah or Rabbinic requirement.

When you buy a book/apple/car/... acquisition is not effected by a monetary transfer.  Moveable objects need to be lifted or pulled toward you.  Why, then, do you give the seller money?  Because he will not have have גמירת דעת/firm and unforced resolve to transfer the property to you without greasing his palms.  That means you very could ask for you money back or a replacement apple if the bag boy drops and steps on your apple.

Houses and other immovable property, on the other hand can be effected by either money, document, or showing your ownership (with the גמירת דעת of the מקנה, of course).  The Sages required that we do all three to avoid arguments.  (Ok... minimize arguments.)  Usually the ownership of a house is demonstrated by the new owner taking the keys and locking the door.  There is an interesting case where that doesn't work.  Suppose a man wants to give his house to his wife before he leaves this world.  (Since his sons -- not his wife -- will inherit his property, he wants to leave her enough ownership so she has a place to live after his demise.  Note that a man's wife is not always his children's' mother. המבין יבין)  In that case, simply locking the door would not effect a transfer of ownership to her because she has always has the right to lock the door.  (Never fear; there are ways that work.)

R' Elchonon Wasserman was once asked how he was not swept in with the tide of communism that swept Europe in the early 20th century.  After all, many Jews were at the forefront of that battle.  With good reason, it seemed to offer a hope to be a part of ending the centuries of persecutions by making all people and nationalities equals.  He said that he read the Communist Manifesto and say that it took away personal property rights from individuals.  Right of property ownership and acquisition, he said, are fundamental Torah ideas.  Any ideology that uproots any Torah idea -- no matter how noble sounding -- is perforce wrong.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…