Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: How, Precisely, Ownership is Transferred from One Party to Another

So you go the the fruit market to get an apple.  Just when does that apple officially become yours?  When you pick it up the fruit bin?  When you hand the money to the cashier?  When you take your apple back from the bagboy?  When you leave the store?

Who cares?  That's a perfectly reasonable question; so let's change the case.  You ordered a gizzy from an Gizzy's R Online, who dutifully charges your credit card and sends you a verification email that they have dropped your gizzy into the USPS postbox on the corner.  You wait a week, two weeks, a month... no gizzy.  You call and say it was never delivered; they offer their condolences, but say their responsibility ends once they drop it into the postbox.  (That actually happened to me.  I never got my gizzy nor did I ever order from them again.)

Of course I made the the case more complicated with sending via messenger and whatnot, but the principles are the same.  In fact, even in the original case, suppose the bagboy drops and steps on the apple.  Did he drop and step on your apple (good luck getting him to buy you another one), or did he drop and step on the store's apple?  As usual, in halacha we are not concerned about the size of the transaction, but on the principles involved.

A transaction always involves two parties: the מקנה/seller and the קונה/buyer.  (Please note that even though I am I am the words seller and buyer, this could equally apply to gifts; it is simply that there are no good English words that cover all cases.  I suppose I could have used "granter" and "accepter"; that that would have been annoying with no real gain in clarification.)  In order for a halachically bind transfer of ownership to occur, each has his part to play.  From the seller we need גמירת דעת/firm and unforced resolve to transfer the property to the buyer.  On the buyer's part we need some sort of physical demonstration that he has taken ownership.  (On caveat, it is possible to transfer ownership to someone even without their knowledge if it is a clear benefit to them; but that's another topic.)

Interestingly, there is no disagreement that the  גמירת דעת of the מקנה is mandated by the Torah; but there is a disagreement as to whether the physical demonstration of ownership on the part of the קונה is a Torah or Rabbinic requirement.

When you buy a book/apple/car/... acquisition is not effected by a monetary transfer.  Moveable objects need to be lifted or pulled toward you.  Why, then, do you give the seller money?  Because he will not have have גמירת דעת/firm and unforced resolve to transfer the property to you without greasing his palms.  That means you very could ask for you money back or a replacement apple if the bag boy drops and steps on your apple.

Houses and other immovable property, on the other hand can be effected by either money, document, or showing your ownership (with the גמירת דעת of the מקנה, of course).  The Sages required that we do all three to avoid arguments.  (Ok... minimize arguments.)  Usually the ownership of a house is demonstrated by the new owner taking the keys and locking the door.  There is an interesting case where that doesn't work.  Suppose a man wants to give his house to his wife before he leaves this world.  (Since his sons -- not his wife -- will inherit his property, he wants to leave her enough ownership so she has a place to live after his demise.  Note that a man's wife is not always his children's' mother. המבין יבין)  In that case, simply locking the door would not effect a transfer of ownership to her because she has always has the right to lock the door.  (Never fear; there are ways that work.)

R' Elchonon Wasserman was once asked how he was not swept in with the tide of communism that swept Europe in the early 20th century.  After all, many Jews were at the forefront of that battle.  With good reason, it seemed to offer a hope to be a part of ending the centuries of persecutions by making all people and nationalities equals.  He said that he read the Communist Manifesto and say that it took away personal property rights from individuals.  Right of property ownership and acquisition, he said, are fundamental Torah ideas.  Any ideology that uproots any Torah idea -- no matter how noble sounding -- is perforce wrong.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק