Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: When "But Maybe You Don't Need כוונה/Intent" Is a Problem

Nope, I am not a fan of doing anything in a manner that is only appropriate בדיעבד, at least not לכתחילה.  So, you might figure, if you are like me (ok, ok... no one is like me; but if you were), you might think, "Heck!  I just need to learn about לכתחילה, because I am never going to do anything only בדיעבד.  Well, then, you'd be very wrong.  (Which is a lot like me, and mostly the story of my life.)  As R' Fuerst is wont to say, "Live and learn."

One reason you should know about בדיעבד is because in a pinch (שעת הדחק is the technical term), a בדיעבד can become לכתחילה.  For example, your day surgery takes a wee bit longer than expected and now -- already near the end of the first 1/3 of the day -- they finally take out all those tubes and you still need to daven... you need to know which parts of p'sukei d'zimra you can skip.  Or you go with your wife for a non-stress test and the doctor says, "Well, how does today -- as in right now -- sound for a birthday?", and by the time the emergency caesarian is finished and you get the new baby (first one... never seen anything so beautiful in my life) to the nursery it is a little past shkiah... you need to know whether you can still daven mincha or need to wait to daven a tashlumin after ma'ariv.  (Have I made my point that "in a pinch" means that you better be pinched pretty hard?*  Sometimes I fear that I am too subtle.** -- (*) That's mussar; "in a pinch" is "in a pinch", I am just saying that you shouldn't let yourself get into that situation without a very good reason.  (**) That's a joke... I never fear that I am being too subtle.  I should fear that I am being to blunt; but alas...)

That's the easy reason and, בעזרת השם, shouldn't come up very often.  There is another and, in fact, another issue -- both more common and more insidious.  The problem occurs because of a discussion of whether or not מצוות צריכות כוונה/the fulfillment of a mitzvah is dependent on ones intention.  First, you obviously need to know and have intention for the action you are performing to even be in the running.  That is, if you happen to absent-mindedly pick up a lulav, esrog, willow branches, and myrtle sticks while you are cleaning the house in preparation for the cleaning lady coming tomorrow (yeah, I don't get it either, but apparently you need to clean before someone comes to clean), and while you are carrying that stuff (you are only minimally aware that your hands are full, but certainly have no idea what is in them) you happen to wave them around and up and down... you have not fulfilled the mitzvah of lulav.  (I believe that may be an award winning run on sentence.)  The question of intention here is whether or not you intend your actions to be performed in fulfillment of an obligation you accepted regarding service to the Creator.

Just to clarify the idea.  Suppose you sign up to build a bookcase.  As long as you follow the instructions, I don't really care whether you are are building it to help me out, to because you need the practice in turning screws and hammering, or because you are hoping I'll do you a favor in kind later.  At the end of the day, I have my bookcase regardless of your intentions.  So HaShem wants me to wave a lulav at Sukkos and light Chanuka candles for eight days once each year.  What difference does it make if I have כוונה/intent that I am performing this action in order to fulfill a mitzvah or not.  If I do it, I do it; if not, not.  Right?

So this turns out to be a huge discussion with lots of proofs on both sides.  When the dust settles we legislate that for Torah obligations כוונה/intent is a requirement, but for Rabbinically mandated obligations כוונה/intent is a "nice to have".  לכתחילה, of course, you really need to have intent regardless of whether it was mandated explicitly at Mount Sinai or implicitly via application of the parliamentary procedures legislated at Mount Sinai.

What's the problem?  Suppose you want to be stringent and always doing things the right way.  One day, nebbich, you slip and are not sure if you had proper כוונה when saying קריאת שמע.  No problem; you'll just repeat, right?  Whoa, there, Quick Draw.  The Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 61:9) says that you are not allowed to say שמע twice in a row -- because it looks like you are talking to two different powers.  Now, even though we pasken that מצוות צריכות כוונה for Torah obligations and קריאת שמע certainly is a Torah obligation.... but since it is a matter of dispute and there is a real, live prohibition to repeat קריאת שמע, we therefore have to be nervous for the opinion that מצוות צריכות אין כוונה even for Torah prohibitions, and so you have already fulfilled your obligation with your first recitation.

Yikes!  There is only one choice: think before you act.  I know, I know, seems very harsh, but there is just no way out of it.  Think before you speak or act, and when you do speak or act, make sure it is with intention.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…