Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: ביטול for Mixtures of Both Similar and Dissimilar Ingredients

We are all familiar with בטל בששים/nullified in 60 when it comes to nullifying forbidden substances (or milk in meat or meat in milk) in mixtures.  I didn't realize just how familiar that concept really is until I saw that Google translated בטל בששים as simply "insignificant".  There is an important detail, however regarding whether the mixture is מין במינו (comprised of similar ingredients) or מין באינו מינו (comprised of dissimilar ingredients).  When it comes to מין באינו מינו, the nullification is needed at a Torah level, whereas when the mixture is מין במינו, the nullification is a Rabbinic stringency.  That, of course, is important for any cases of doubt whether there is actually 60 times the volume in the permitted substance to nullify the forbidden one.  We'll call the forbidden substance (hoped to be small volume) the "solute", and the majority component of permitted substance the "solvent".  This both saves typing and also takes on an air of scientific precision.

What is an example of מין במינו?  Campbell's chicken soup with my wife's chicken soup.  (Actually my wife's chicken soup is so amazing that I consider any other soup as a forbidden solute, but that is neither here nor there.)  מין באינו מינו?  Lard with Crisco.  (Hah!  I am one of the few readers of this TftD who have tasted lard permissibly.  For those of you who have never tasted lard, I assure you that it tastes much different -- and better -- than Crisco.  For those of you who have also tasted lard; shame on you!)

How do you get to a case of not knowing whether you have enough solvent to solute?  Being lazy about due diligence, by the way, is not an example of doubt.  You are expected to know or go back and determine how much milk fell into your meat (or vice versa).  Suppose however, one oz of Campbell's chicken soup fell into 30 oz of kosher chicken, and so you quickly scoop up where the Campbell's fell and dump it out.  Similar scenario for the Crisco and lard.  (What is the Campbell's chicken soup and lard doing in your kitchen?  Darned if I know.)  So now you definitely have more permitted solvent than forbidden solute.  However, you don't -- and can't (without chemical analysis) -- know if there is 60 times the volume of solvent to solute.  In that case the soup will be permitted -- we are lenient regarding doubt in a Rabbinic requirement; the shortening will be forbidden -- we are stringent regarding doubt in Torah matter.

How do you remember which is which?  After listening to the same few shiurim a dozen or so times, I finally got it.  Why does מין באינו מינו require a volume of 60 solvent to solute?  Because of the principle that טעם כעיקר דאורייתא/if you can taste it, the Torah regards that as eating the substance itself.  We need that volume of 60:1 in order to nullify the taste.  So as long as you are not sure you have 60:1 in a mixture of מין באינו מינו -- where you have a foreign taste admixture -- then you are in a case of doubt regarding a Torah requirement.  Why do we need a ratio of 60:1 for מין במינו?  Obviously it can't depend on taste; that's what מין במינו means, the taste is the same (according to the Shach, anyway).  In that case, the Torah requires a simple majority; then Chazal came and enacted a stringency to require a ratio of 60:1.  Since the 60:1 requirement for מין במינו mixtures is Rabbinic, the cases of doubt will be permitted.

Isn't that cool?  And that coolness is definitely a fulfillment of a Torah obligation to learn and understand.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Sometimes a Food Loses Its Identity When It Loses Its Bracha; Sometimes It Doesn't

Let's start with a question: Why are We Allowed to Drink Coffee and Whiskey Made by Non-Jews?  Before you ask,"Why would I think that I shouldn't be able to drink whiskey and coffee made by non-Jews?", I'll tell you. Simple, we all know that Chazal made a decree -- known as בישול עכו''ם/bishul akim -- that particular foods cooked by non-Jews are forbidden.  There are basically two criteria that determines if a dish falls into this category:
Is not consumed raw.Fit for a royal banquet. Cooked carrots, therefore, are not a problem since they can be eaten raw (I actually prefer them that way).  Baked beans are find because the are not prestigious enough.  (For great synopsis of the laws, see the article on the Star-K site, FOOD FIT FOR A KING, by Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, shlita.)  There are lots of cool questions and details (baked potatoes are prestigious, does that make even potato chips and issue?) which are for another time.  Clearly, though, both coffee an…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…