Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Critters That the Torah Considers As Not Coming from Parents

Subtitle: The role of observational science in halacha.

The task to prove that all odd numbers are prime is given to a group of scientists.  The mathematician says, "3 is prime, 5 is prime; by induction all odd numbers are prime."  The physicist says, "1, 3, 5, 7 are prime.  9 is not prime... hmm... 11, 13 are prime.  Seems that 9 is an outlier/experimental error."  The chemist says, "1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11... all prime, so I guess all odd numbers are prime."  The biologist says, "1 is prime, 2 is prime, 3 is prime, 4 is prime.  What's the question?"

I bring this up for a few reasons.  First, a physicist always looks for opportunities to show disdain for the fact that people include biology as science; we look at them as observers and classifiers.  Important, but hardly science.  (I know I'm going to get in trouble for this...)  Secondly, though, look at the way the task was framed: prove all odd numbers are prime.  The task should have been: determine if all odd numbers are prime.  It is an all too common trap for scientists; proving something "known" to be true instead of determining with proof the truth (or not) of a proposition.  Third -- and this pains the physicist in me, but true is true -- the biologist is clearly using a different definition of of the word prime (and maybe even "number") than the rest of the group.

Chazal say that certain animals do not פרה ורבה/"reproduce"; they just come from themselves.  Enlightened thinkers delight in using the fact that we "know" that there is no such thing as spontaneous reproduction and so it just goes to show that the ancients did the best they could, but we know better.  Uh huh.  Let's examine that.

Yoreh Dei'ah 94:15 says the birds (עופות) that grow on trees and hang from their beaks are forbidden because they are bugs.  Many people skip that siman because they have never heard of birds (or bugs, for that matter) that grow from trees by their beak so they have no idea what the Shulchan Aruch means.  R' Dovid Cohen of the CRC consulted university professor type ornithologists concerning this animal he had seen described in old book and wondered if they had any ideas.  They answered without hesitation, "Oh yes, that's the barnacle goose.  They thought they grew on trees in the middle ages, as documented in their bestiaries.  Really they lay their eggs in the arctic so no one ever saw the eggs until modern times."

So what was the Shulchan Aruch thinking?  It is not a mistake in the Shulchan Aruch, it is a mistake for those of you who don't understand what the Shulchan Aruch is.  The Shulchan Aruch is a brief handbook for the medieval household to look up halacha.  People wanted to know if they could eat barnacle geese.  The Shulchan Aruch said, "First of all, we don't have a tradition for them; so no.  But anyway, if they really grow from trees, then they are not what the Torah calls birds, they are what the Torah calls bugs."

Now that we have this principle that we need to be very careful when translating Torah concepts into modern terminology, lets look further.  The specific kind of bugs (שרץ) is also know as one that doesn't פרה ורבה.  Let's look a bit further into that.  If it grew from a tree, that's called "doesn't reproduce (the usual way)" -- even if it started as an egg from a mother bug and fertilized by a father bug.  Why?  Because the tree offered more than a haven; it was an integral participant in the development of the bug.  Other bugs, such as lice (which the gemara also says do not פרה ורבה) grow from nits whose gestation depends on the external environment.  They are part of a whole class of bugs that "overwinter".  That is, they decide based on the environment how fast to develop and when to emerge.

Moral: don't start arguing without first thoroughly thinking through the issue and understanding the terms and premise(s) of the topic.

One last parting shot at biologists: A respected college biology text book says (and, yes, this is a real quote):
People used to believe in spontaneous generation.  We now know after countless experiments that life never comes from non-life (except once millions of years ago when it happened once).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…