Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Understanding Certainty from Uncertainty

I must admit to being sympathetic to Robert Frost's traveler who prefers the road less traveled.  Part of my bike ride to work is along part of the North Branch of the Chicago River.  The path I take is on the east side and is very well travelled, as it is lined with parks and even a swimming pool.  This morning I decided to take the "road less travelled by" (sic) on the west side of the river.  It was glorious.  No other bikes nore even pedestrians.  I bit narrow in places, closer to the river, and comfortably overhung with trees.  At one point, though, the paving came to an abrupt end, and I was facing dirt path.  I didn't worry too much, and was certainly not going to retrace my steps/rotations (harrumph)!  Quickly the overhung became overgrown.  Finally, the path was all but gone and I was wedged between a chain link fence and a forest of trees.  By the time I thought this might not be such a good idea (I'm slow to realize those things...), it was too late (read: impossible because I couldn't turn around and backing through the brush and branches was not a viable option) to turn back.  I finally emerged from thicket with only one more hurdle -- a fallen tree blocking the egress -- over which I carried my bike and continued to the well travelled path.

In spite of some scratches and bruises (perhaps, because of, as it makes for a better story), I was pleased to have made the trek.  Which is also precisely why I do not want to take the road less travelled in halacha.  Especially as someone who came to observance and learning later in life, I am rather picky about what I ingest.for "halacha l'ma'aseh".  First and foremost, of course, my posek is R' Fuerst.  When it comes to learning from a text, though, my first go to is, of course, Mishna Brura.  Now I have the Dirshu edition which helps by bringing in authorities who address issues that are new since the Mishna Brura and also complements it in some areas.  I also now will (time permitting... isn't that always the great hope?) look up some of the referenced texts; especially when the Mishna Brura himself recommends seeing more details here or there.

I have one more source to fill in gaps and increase my breadth: R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach,  Whenever R' Fuerst says over a chidush from R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, and I ask "can I rely on that", the answer is in the affirmative.  Baruch HaShem, R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach has (and is quoted in) many important s'farim.  Shemiras Shabbos K'Hilchasa, of course is a practical and very accessible reference.  I have recently been learning Shulchan Shlomo, which is R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach commentary on the hilchos Shabbos section of Shulchan Aruch.  I say "commentary", because he often doesn't give a final p'sak, but brings up interesting issues.

For example: If you want to leave food hot/cooking on Shabbos, one needs to cover the flame/burner; aka, have a blech.  However, if the food is completely cooked and will only get worse with more heating, then technically you don't need a blech.  The Shulchan Shlomo therefore proposes that one could, in principle, remove the blech.  (You'd have to be very careful not to lift the pot more than just barely enough to be able to slide out the blech so you don't get into issues of returning the pot to the fire, which are much more serious.)  Suppose however, the food was not fully cooked before Shabbos and only becomes fully cooked after nightfall.

Now... we have a general principle that once something is muktza throughout twilight, then it remains muktza for the entire Shabbos.  On the one hand, therefore, since the blech needed to remain under the pot throughout twilight (ie, it is muktza), then you shouldn't be able to move it even later.  On the other hand, you could have decided to take the pot completely off the fire at any time during twilight, at which time you could have removed the blech (since there wouldn't be any necessity for it anymore).  Since you could have moved it during twilight (but you didn't), does that mean that it doesn't fall under our general rule.  That's the end of the discussion; the Shulchan Shlomo then goes on to a completely new topic.

What's the point?  By making explicit where doubts/uncertainty arise, you see with crystal clarity and certainty where there will be no question.  This seemingly extraneous excursions into questions like this are actually bright and clear borders on our map of halacha.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Sometimes a Food Loses Its Identity When It Loses Its Bracha; Sometimes It Doesn't

Let's start with a question: Why are We Allowed to Drink Coffee and Whiskey Made by Non-Jews?  Before you ask,"Why would I think that I shouldn't be able to drink whiskey and coffee made by non-Jews?", I'll tell you. Simple, we all know that Chazal made a decree -- known as בישול עכו''ם/bishul akim -- that particular foods cooked by non-Jews are forbidden.  There are basically two criteria that determines if a dish falls into this category:
Is not consumed raw.Fit for a royal banquet. Cooked carrots, therefore, are not a problem since they can be eaten raw (I actually prefer them that way).  Baked beans are find because the are not prestigious enough.  (For great synopsis of the laws, see the article on the Star-K site, FOOD FIT FOR A KING, by Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, shlita.)  There are lots of cool questions and details (baked potatoes are prestigious, does that make even potato chips and issue?) which are for another time.  Clearly, though, both coffee an…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…