Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Ensuring Equal Protection in the Jewish Court

One way to deflect dealing with an issue and feel like you have won the argument is to make an absolutely false statement that rings true, gets people nodding, and immediately halts any further discussion.  Here's an example: Automation take away jobs!  No, not really; it may shift emphasis on good skills for future jobs, and it certainly does create new jobs.  Moreover, since more can get done for less money and time, everyone benefits and whole new business opportunities are created.

Here's another favorite of mine: If men had babies, then !  Umm... whatever gender gets pregnant, carries the developing human, and then gives birth is the gender that I am going to call women.  The fact is that if having babies is important, then someone's going to have to take time off from job and career to do that.  If you believe in evolution (silly you), then you would have to note that billions of years of barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen cannot be reversed by a couple of hundred years of suffrage.

I can't (ok... won't) speak for other cultures, but the Torah obligated makes having children an obligation that is borne by men.  Yes; men.  Of course, to fulfill that obligation, a man has to convince a woman to bear his children.  This, perforce, is going to pose a variety of risks to her health and freedom.  First protection: a woman has no obligation in halacha to have children.  She is certainly encouraged, but by no means obligated.  Moreover, she is exempt from time bound positive commandments.  That is true even if she never has children.  If you think about it, you'll see that anything else would be devious way to coerce her to have children.  The Torah wants her to have a truly free choice about taking on that obligation.  Of course, once she accepts that, she is expected to live with that decision.

Our sages have also put protections in place for her.  For example, her husband is required to provide for her physical and emotional needs.  Because he is obligated in providing her physical needs -- food, clothing, housing, etc -- her wages go to her husband.  However, if she chooses, she may decide that she wants to take care of her own physical needs and keep her wages.  She protected either way and may determine for herself and according to her circumstances what works best for her.  Of course, if she decides to keep her wages, then she cannot demand support from her husband.  That is also done for her protection, to ensure that there is enough parity in the financial arrangements that neither side will feel they are "getting the short end of the deal" and thereby feel enmity.  Please note well: I am not making up apologetics; I am quoting to you from the reasons given in the meeting notes we have from those discussions when the laws were decreed.

Here I am claiming that men and women are treated fairly and equitably, with due consideration for their unique and special circumstances.  How, then, does the world have such a different perception?  I have so much chutzpah?!  Well, maybe; but the real answer is that "the world" is missing information.  I once kidded my daughter that I somehow managed to survive my childhood without ever having nor needing a mobile phone.  She replied directly on point: "But Abba, since those things didn't exist, there was a different infrastructure.  You didn't have mobile phones, but you had pay phones."  The view from the external world is based on partial information taken out of context.  As an aside, my progression toward Orthodox Judaism was spurred along by always finding that the Orthodox description of derivative religions agreed with those religions' own descriptions.  However, the derivative religions of Orthodox Judaism was very often contrary to reality, based on partial information and hearsay, with a does of just "axe to grind" added for good measure.  (Please, please don't take my word for that; check it out yourself.  I was as shocked as you will be.)

I will just end by noting that even though our Sages have ensured equity under the law for men and women; that is only for human adjudicated law.  Regarding the situation in the heavenly tribunal, I can only tell you this.  The default way to identify an individual is as Ploni son/daughter of Ploni's-Father.  (Akin to how we use the father's last name in marriage and for children by convention in America and most western countries.)  The exception is when praying for someone's health or welfare.  In that case, we use Ploni son/daughter of Ploni's-Mother.  Why?  Because it is taken for granted that a woman's standing in HaShem's eye is very likely greater than a man's.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Sometimes a Food Loses Its Identity When It Loses Its Bracha; Sometimes It Doesn't

Let's start with a question: Why are We Allowed to Drink Coffee and Whiskey Made by Non-Jews?  Before you ask,"Why would I think that I shouldn't be able to drink whiskey and coffee made by non-Jews?", I'll tell you. Simple, we all know that Chazal made a decree -- known as בישול עכו''ם/bishul akim -- that particular foods cooked by non-Jews are forbidden.  There are basically two criteria that determines if a dish falls into this category:
Is not consumed raw.Fit for a royal banquet. Cooked carrots, therefore, are not a problem since they can be eaten raw (I actually prefer them that way).  Baked beans are find because the are not prestigious enough.  (For great synopsis of the laws, see the article on the Star-K site, FOOD FIT FOR A KING, by Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, shlita.)  There are lots of cool questions and details (baked potatoes are prestigious, does that make even potato chips and issue?) which are for another time.  Clearly, though, both coffee an…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…