Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Search for Truth Must be Accompanied by Clear and Verifiable Evidence

More on the Kuzari's rejection of Christianity and Islam.

To the Christian Scholar: The flow of your argument is not logical and I didn't grow up with it.

To the Islam Scholar: The record of the miraculous events surrounding Mohamed is in Arabic, and I don't read Arabic.

The Talmid Chocham: We believe in the G-d of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; Who took the Isralite nation out of Egypt, sustained them in the wilderness, bequeathed to them the Land of Canaan. And that was after He brought them thought the sea and across the Jordan River with outstanding wonders. He sent Moses with His Torah, and after that many thousands of prophets who all exhorted us regarding that Torah and who promised reward to those who keep the Torah and punishment for those who rebelled against it. We believe in all that is written in the Torah according to the received interpretation.

The Kuzari: Shouldn't you have said you believe in the Creator the of the world and His running of the world, like all other religions?

The Talmid Chocham: That would be an exercise in philosophy; an intellectual exercise of logical proofs and reasonable assertions. It could not, however, lead to a true perspective on how to live one's life.

Until I read what the Talmid Chocham had to say to the Kuzari, I was more than slightly puzzled about how the Kuzari rejected Christianity and Islam. If the ideas of Christianity are illogical, what does it matter that he didn't grow up with them. If the miracles of Islam are not proof, then what does it matter that they are recorded in Arabic? But these are the words of a Rishon, and perhaps even more important, these words have been studied by countless talmidei chochamim over the centuries and none sought to amend these arguments.

In general, when one is confronted with with illogical conclusions there are two way to deal with the situation. One is to reject the argument. In this case, that option is not tenable for the reasons stated above. The other approach is to re-examine the assumptions that let to the problem. We have up till now assumed that that the Kuzari is saying that the Christianity is in and of itself illogical. Let us rethink that. The Kuzari, I would like to propose, does not think that Christianity is in and of itself illogical. (There are, after all, many very intelligent Christians.) Rather, he is saying that to appreciate the Christian world view requires an unreasonable level of trust until one can see its logic. This is not uncommon when changing perspective. In modern times we have gone from a world view that included a static, infinitely old universe to the Big Bang. We have gone from the precise and rock steady view of Newtonian mechanics to the more queasy reality of quantum mechanics and its uncertainty principle.

What, then, is the Kuzari's reason for rejecting Christianity? Not that the world view is illogical, but that Christianity offers no proof other than a promise that all will be clear once one fully appreciates all that Christianity has to offer. The Kuzari rejects that because he has already been through trying to find the the appropriate way to live his life and serve his Creator. After all he tried, the Kuzari was finally told, "G-d appreciates your intent, but not your actions." That being the case, it must be that the true service to G-d must be presented with evidence that is logical to anyone. This is a much stronger case against Christianity than any consistency proof or historical proof. The case against Christianity is simply that any complete world view cannot be appreciated without a lifetime of work. If the true service to G-d could only be discovered after one's life is complete, only one born into that religion could ever know what to do. Anyone else would be in a complete quandry... faced with many choices of what to choose; all with the promise, "it will eventually make sense". G-d could not present Himself that way and have any complaint against someone who choose wrong.

With this, the argument against Islam is also clear. Of course the Kuzari expects G-d to introduce Himself with miraculous events. But those events must be accessible to all, not only those who speak Arabic. The miraculous events that are public knowledge are those that pertain to Abraham and also to the Exodus from Egypt. These events were open and public; they were known to all. The events of Muhammad, on the other hand, are private and recorded only in the Koran in Arabic. Again, not a proof that can be verified; and therefore not a possible religion.

After dedicating his life to finding Truth, the Kuzari king has come to the conclusion that the true service to G-d must be accompanied by clear and verifiable evidence. Open, public miracles certainly satisfies that condition. Unverifiable, private miracles or promises of eventual enlightenment do not.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Sometimes a Food Loses Its Identity When It Loses Its Bracha; Sometimes It Doesn't

Let's start with a question: Why are We Allowed to Drink Coffee and Whiskey Made by Non-Jews?  Before you ask,"Why would I think that I shouldn't be able to drink whiskey and coffee made by non-Jews?", I'll tell you. Simple, we all know that Chazal made a decree -- known as בישול עכו''ם/bishul akim -- that particular foods cooked by non-Jews are forbidden.  There are basically two criteria that determines if a dish falls into this category:
Is not consumed raw.Fit for a royal banquet. Cooked carrots, therefore, are not a problem since they can be eaten raw (I actually prefer them that way).  Baked beans are find because the are not prestigious enough.  (For great synopsis of the laws, see the article on the Star-K site, FOOD FIT FOR A KING, by Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, shlita.)  There are lots of cool questions and details (baked potatoes are prestigious, does that make even potato chips and issue?) which are for another time.  Clearly, though, both coffee an…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…