Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Not Bad Is Not The Same As Good

There is an interesting (your mileage may vary, of course; but I find it interesting) logical principle known as the law of the excluded middle.  In broad/loose terms, it asserts that every statement is either true or false.  It follows from that law that proving a statement is not false is the same as proving it is true.  There are some interesting "corner cases" (such as whether to call the following true or false:  "The current king of France is bald"; being as there is no current king of France, it is hard to call it true, but false implies there is a king of France).  Be that as it may, this law is not a good approach to avodas HaShem.

We had the z'chus (by "we", I mean the vasikin minyan) to have Rabbi Doniel Lehrfeld, the Rosh Yeshiva of Yeshivas Beis Yisrael davening with us for nearly a week.  As is our custom, the Rosh Yeshiva was asked to say a d'var at our kiddush Shabbos morning.  As is his custom, the d'var torah was delightful, to the point, and very clear.  The Torah at the end of parashas Shemini explains our basic kosher dietary laws.  Regarding the animals, the Torah begins with the rules for those animals that we are allowed to eat; chew their cud and have split hooves.  In regard to the birds, though, the Torah lists those birds which are forbidden to us.  The m'forshim (see Rashi there) bring the reason: Most animal are no kosher, so the Torah tells us which are permitted; most birds, however, are kosher, so the Torah tells us which are forbidden.

Noted R' Lehrfeld: we have a rule in כל התורה כולה that we follow the majority in case of doubt.  That being the case, why are we only allowed to eat animals for which we have a tradition they are permitted?  In particular, how can there possibly be an issue with turkey?  Even though we have no clear מסורה that is it permitted, there is no question that it is not on the forbidden list.  The answer is from the last verse of the parasha; these laws are given to distinguish between the unclean and the clean (more accurately: בֵּין הַטָּמֵא וּבֵין הַטָּהֹר), and between the animal that may be eaten and the animal that may not be eaten.  As Rashi there notes:
It is not enough to just learn the laws, one must become an expert in recognizing and identifying these animals.  It is not hard to distinguish a deer from a donkey: the Torah wants us to know to distinguish בֵּין הַטָּמֵא וּבֵין הַטָּהֹר for us; that is, between a שחיטה that goes through most of the esophagus and/or trachea and only half; between a fully healthy animal and one with signs of a treifah.
For a Jew it is never good enough to know "it's not forbidden"; the Torah demands that we know with certainty that is it permitted.

This principle of avodas HaShem is particularly relevant now at Peasch.  At the seder (and, according to many poskim) we are required to eat shumra matzah; matzah that has actively been keep chameitz free.  In all the halachos of questions on the matzah which are after the fact permissible -- wheat may have gotten wet before Pesach, flour may have been nibbled on by a mouse (much cuter than a rat), touching a doubled matzah in the baking, etc, etc, etc -- the Mishna Brura, after noting its permissibility, never fails to add:  But not at the seder (and, according to many poskim, all of pesach); permitted it is, guarded it is not.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…