Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Recognition That You Are Owed Nothing Is The Foundation Of All

Suppose I asked you if you believed in atoms.  You would probably look at me like I was from another planet and wonder what I was up to.  (Fair enough... I'm usually up to something when I ask a question like that.)  Still, you would likely play along and answer in the affirmative.  What if I then asked you for evidence you have for that belief, being as neither you nor anyone else has ever or will ever actually see an atom?  ("Aha!", you think, "I knew he was up to no good!")

Now suppose I were to ask you if you believe that stealing is morally wrong.  Same eye rolling on your part, again deciding to play along and answer in the affirmative.  This time when I ask you for your evidence, however, your answer is, "I don't need evidence; it is logical that taking something that belongs to someone else is morally wrong."

Now we can begin.

There is a strange discussion in the gemara (Brachos 35a) (my free translation):
Fact 1: It is forbidden to benefit from this world without making a bracha.
Fact 2: Benefiting without making a bracha is tantamount to stealing from G-d. Question 1: What is the remedy for someone who transgresses?
Answer: Go to a חכם (one who is truly steeped in Torah knowledge and understanding)
Astonished Retort: Go to a חכם?!? How will that help? He already committed the crime!
Answer (Revised): Go to a חכם from the beginning to learn brachos so this won't happen.
Um... what?  First of all, what information did the revised answer impart that could not have been inferred from the original answer. Second, how in the world did that answer the challenge?  He still already committed the crime, after all!  Yet the gemara just continues on its merry way.

I propose that to understand this gemara, one needs to note its context (I know, I know, adding facts always kills all the fun).  The preceding gemara, in fact nearly all of page 35a is beautiful dialectic that begins with the question, "How do I know that it is forbidden to benefit from this world without making a bracha?".  The conclusion: It's logical.  Very cool; proposed sources right and left, all knocked down.  The arguments leads the reader to examine tiny details of halacha and fine logical inferences from rabbinic statements only to conclude: never mind, there is no proof, it's just logical.

As fun as that gemara is (I know someone personally who was positively giddy with excitement at the conlusion), but מאי נפקא מינה/what practical difference does it make whether making brachos is logical or based in fine halachic reasoning?

The answer is the strange discussion above that follows that conclusion immediately.  If brachos were based on detailed logic, so someone who doesn't know that logic will not make brachos.  There's nothing to fix.  It's like asking someone what evidence they have for atoms.  Not knowing is not a sin.  If you want to know, go ask a scientist; if you don't, don't.

But if a person doesn't know stealing is wrong, then he needs more than learning the laws of torts.  In fact, before he learns the laws of tort he very much needs to go to a חכם and have an attitude adjustment.  The questioner above wanted to know what was the remedy to having failed to make a bracha.  The answer was that the issue is not that he didn't make a bracha, the issue is that he obviously does not understand what a bracha is and the statement it makes.  That person needs to go to a חכם  and start over -- from the beginning of his understanding of what he is doing in this world -- and start learning brachos.

After that, we can talk about atoms.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…