Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Freedom of Choice Does Not Grant Right to Choose Evil

I did a quick poll and discovered two things about the fact I am about to post to a "public forum" (I have that in quotes because I am not sure my blog counts a public forum, based on the stats of visits each day.)  None the less, there was unanimous agreement among everyone I polled on two points: (1) What I am about to say is true.  (2) I shouldn't say it in public.  You have been warned.

I know there are gangs in the south side of Chicago, and other inner cities, that engage in lawless behavior.  They are known for stealing and even murder.  They have their own rules.  I do not believe a person has a right to engage in such behaviors.  It's not just that I believe that membership in a gang like that would be wrong for me, I actually believe it is wrong for anyone.  There; I said it.  I know they have freedom of choice, but I do not believe that a choice to belong to a gang is a choice I have to say they have a right to make.  You want to live in the United States, you are bound by the Constitution and the law of the land; laws passed by the legal legislative branch of the government as also is the law of the of the Constitution.  The Torah says so, "dina malchusa dina"/the law of the land must be followed.

Frankly, I was surprised that I was warned about saying something like that.  That's ok; I am used to having my opinion of what's ok to say being different than normal people.  To be fair, I should note that I mean to include groups that do even worse things than stealing.  For example, groups that believe they can commit murder just because they feel like it, are also included in my list of groups that I don't feel compelled to agree that people have a right to join.  So, right, I don't believe people have a right to be Nazis and KKK grand pubahs.

Why do I believe that?  Well, the Torah -- the one and only communication of how human beings are expected to conduct themselves from the One and Only Creator -- says so.  The Torah says murder is forbidden, so membership to groups who espouse murder is forbidden and shouldn't be tolerated.

I am, of course, not planning to the south side to discuss these facts with any gang members.  That would be stupid.  (Not to say I don't do stupid things, but at least I try not to plan to do stupid things.)  Besides being stupid, the Torah says not to do that "mishum eiva" -- it leads to unnecessary bad feelings at a time when we are not in charge, so lay low.

The G"ra, commenting on Mishlei 6:30/31 notes that as bad as stealing is, at least there is a reason for it (either the robber doesn't have enough to eat or doesn't have the money for the thing he wants) and stealing can always be repaired.  Sexual immorality and avoda zara, on the other hand, have no excuse and cannot be repaired.  Since everyone agrees that membership in a gang (who only espouses robbery and violence) is not a right people should have, then certainly everyone will agree that membership in a group which espouses public avoda zara (such as Hinuism, Christianity, and the Reform Jewish Religion) is not a right anyone should have.  Not "not right for me", but actually not right for anyone.

Right?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc