Skip to main content
Yes, Virginia, There Really is Good and Evil

I think this is a question that nags at all of us:

Do you think that a basic knowledge of good vs. evil is inherent in our psyche (in a sort of Jungian way)? Or is it something we learn? I guess a question I have always had since childhood is how do you know if what you are doing is actually good?


The Rabbis tell us (Eruvin 100b):

אמר רבי יוחנן אילמלא לא ניתנה תורה היינו למידין צניעות מחתול וגזל מנמלה ועריות מיונ
R' Yochanan says, had the Torah not been given, we could learn modesty from the cat, [not to] steal from the ant, and fidelity from the dove.

Why wouldn't we learn not to be modest from a dog, stealing from ravens, and infidelity from the cat? On first glance, then, it seems like we *do* have some inner moral compass. We may not be able say what is good and evil, but we recognize it when we see it. As is often the case, first impressions are misleading. First, the Torah *has* been given and it could very well be that we have lost the natural sensitivity for good and evil once that happened. It is well known that college students now (who have grown up with calculators and computers) have less "feel" for numbers than generations who grew up working through calculations by hand (or slide rule... I actually miss my slide rule).

Moreover, the world is in balance. Everything is kept in a strict balance to allow us to make real, free choices about good and evil. Once the Torah was given (so that the good or evil of every deed and thought was more apparent), the inclination and ability to rationalize one's actions, thoughts, and even feelings was also increased. How many people smoke and rationalize that the data doesn't apply to them, or the research is faulty, or the fun of smoking is worth the risk of lung cancer and heart disease? There is also rationalizing that the evil isn't so bad; again basically rationalizing that while there is evil in the action, when you add it all up there is a net good.

On the other hand, there are also things that are uniquely human. Those things good not be learned from observing the world. Anything involving speech, for example, could not be learned from observing animals. You can't learn about murder from observing animals, either. Obviously you can't learn from animals anything about Shabbos, prayer, modes of dress, etc.

So I believe we are left with a situation that, practically speaking, one cannot "feel" right and wrong; rather, it must be learned. That is, there must be an external standard of right and wrong. Lest you think that it is not such a big deal, as long as you get things "mostly" good, consider the situation in the world before Lister. Surgeries were done in non-sterile conditions because no one knew any better. Imagine trying to tell a surgeon from them about these invisible things that can cause death in his patients unless he takes certain precautions, like using chemicals to wash his hands and instruments; he would think you were nuts. Yet that is the reality; there really are invisible things that are deadly.

The answer to the question, then, is that we have to learn about good and evil. Good and evil are real; you can't just make them up. Not learning -- and remaining in ignorance -- is not an option; because the Torah has, in fact, been given. Our sensitivity to spirituality has, in fact, been deadened. We need to learn, and we have no excuses. If not now, when?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק