Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Science is Just Fine; Please Be an Educated Consumer of Information

Here is a real pet peeve of mine.  When people ask: Was is suppose to rain today?  My usual answer is along the lines of, "Given that it is raining, I am going to go with -- yes."  Their question is really "did my weather app predict this rain?"  If the answer is no, it is a question on the app, *not* on the rain.  (Yes, I am fully cognizant that this is the reason I don't have many friends.  Your point?)

What prompted this little mini-rant was a link to an article sent to me the other day.
Science (from Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge") is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe.
People with a religious bent are wont to complain about how science is wrong about Creation and evolution.  I respectfully -- albeit vehemently -- disagree; see here for a more correct approach.  Or here for an explanation that evolution is bad science... it's relationship to religion is therefore irrelevant.

Bad journalism doesn't help my crusade.  A recent online article had this eye catching title: "Universe Should Not Actually Exist: Big Bang Produced Equal Amounts Of Matter And Antimatter".  This article is sensationalist and truly bad science... I wish I were shocked.  I won't dignify this trash with a link (but you know how to Google as well as I do).  But here's a rule: any publication -- I can't think of a singe exception, except maybe the Hogwarts newspaper -- that has the word "Times" or "Tribune" in its name is not a good source of accurate information on science.  It is of some level of entertainment value.

The point here, analogously to the rain conversation recorded above, is:  Yes, all current scientific models of how the universe came into being predict that matter and antimatter should exist in equal measure.  We observe something different than that.  Which means either the models are wrong or the observations are incomplete.  It does not mean that the universe should not exist.

I hate this kind of article because it misrepresents science.  Most high school and many university teachers/professors are also guilty of repeating their own ignorant and nonsense ideas in the name of science.  An article Science (yes; that's a good one) decried the way interesting experiments -- such as the famous black/white moth experiment that demonstrates natural selection -- are unfortunately used by high school and many university teachers/professors as proof of evolution.  There are many experiments to demonstrate natural selection; there are none that demonstrate evolution.  (Before you react: they certainly do demonstrate the possibility of evolution; that is worlds away from proving evolution.)  The article concluded: We owe our students better than that.

I agree.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc