Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: A Plethora of S'feikos

The general rule, of course, is "safeik d'rabanan l'kula" -- In a situation where one may or not be running afoul of a rabbinic prohibition, the halacha is that one is not running afoul of the prohibition.  I tried to state that carefully, because "safeik d'rabanan l'kula" does not mean that you can assume there is no problem.  It is the situation that has the s'feikos/doubts, not the halacha.  That can mean that sometimes s'feik safeik d'rabanan l'kula can lead to a chumra/stringency.  For example, we add "al ha'nisim"/for the miracles to bentching and shmone esrei during Chanuka and Purim.  If one is in doubt if he said them, then he is not obligated to repeat with the insertion.  Once he is not obligated, then he now not allowed to repeat, because the (now) unnecessary insertion becomes a forbidden interruption.

The interesting thing about "safeik d'rabanan l'kula" is all of the exceptions.  Consider the siman 325 -- concerning a non-Jew who does a malacha on Shabbos for a Jew's benefit.  The basic rule is that a Jew is not allowed to benefit from a malacha that was done for him on Shabbos by a non-Jew; even though the non-Jew was asking on his own volition.  It is rabbinic enactment to forestall a Jew from asking a non-Jew to do something for him; since he can't benefit, he won't ask.  Suppose you aren't sure if he did a malacha for you.  For example: A non-Jew brings fresh fruit to you on Shabbos.  If the fruit was brought from outside the t'chum/shabbos boundaries, then that fruit cannot be eaten by any Jew till after Shabbos sometime, and it is muktza for the one (and his family) for whom it was brought.  So far, so good.

What if he only might have brought it from outside the t'chum?  You would think "safeik d'rabanan l'kula", so we should be able to eat it, right?  Nope.  There is another rule that kicks in: "davar sh'yeish li materin"/the fruit will become permissible in just a few hours, so in that case the rabbis didn't permit it even in the case of safeik.

Unless the non-Jew has two houses -- one inside the t'chum and one outside the t'chum.  In that case you are allowed to assume that he brought the fruit from his house that is inside the t'chum.  That's a rule known as "kahn nimtza, kahn hayu"/it's here now, so we can assume it was here before.

What if has two houses outside the t'chum?  The biur halacha on syef 9 (d.h. shnei batim) brings the Ta"z who invokes the rule of "karov v'rov, rov adif"/when the safeik is about whether he came from the closest area or the area where he has the majority of his residences, the majority takes precedence.  The biur halacha takes issue with that, though, because we can apply the rule of "kahn nimtza, kahn hayu" to the non-Jew himself, which he feels probably overrides the "karov v'rov, rov adif" rule in this case.

One thing about which there is no doubt at all... this is so much fun!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…