Skip to main content

Derech HaShem: 1.1 Belief in and about G-d

The Ramchal begins by making six points of belief that are vital to an understanding of G-d and the entire system:

  1. G-d exists; His existence precedes all and is eternal.
  2. We can never really know G-d Himself; that knowledge is beyond the capability of a created being.
  3. G-d exists perforce.  That is, the whole concept of existence only has meaning within the context of G-d.  In a sense, He precedes even existence itself.
  4. G-d does not depend on anything else, but everything else depends on Him.  He brings into being and constantly sustains everything.
  5. G-d is absolutely without parts or division.  When we speak of G-d's attributes (His knowledge, His mercy, His kindness), those are completely our perception and not something intrinsic to Him.  From G-d's point of view (so to speak), they are all one: Him.
  6. G-d is unique and cannot not even be described in terms of anything besides G-d Himself.
The importance and implications of (6) are discussed at some length in Da'as T'vunos.

Note I am using the term "G-d" (instead of HaShem, for example) to stress the point that anything that we can name (HaShem, Sha-kai, kel, etc) is itself a creation; it is a guise via which G-d chooses to interact with His creation, but not at all His true essence.  That is, each name we use is referring to a particular way in which G-d interacts with the world.  Some names can actually even be used to bring about "supernatural" effects, as the Ramchal discusses later (not "outside of the whole system", but "outside of teva/nature").  His true essence, however, is completely inaccessible to us.  We refer to that in shmone esrei at the end of modim when we say, "hatov shimcha, u'l'cha na'eh l'hodos" -- "Your name (ie, the way You present yourself in all of its guises) is good, and to You (ie, the unnameable and unfathomable true essence which is You) is appropriate to acknowledge/thank"  With that clarity, we'll stop ever asking "why did G-d do such and such" (because that is impossible for us to know); rather we will ask, "what am I to learn from the fact that G-d chose to do such and such".
Second, we know these things via nevua and mesora, but can be logically derived (according to the Ramchal).  We see here (again) the importance of nevua.  In this case, however, the mesora gives us the strength of conviction to know and stand behind (and up to) these ideas even when I can't derive them logically.  It is something like the belief in atoms.  I have (of course) never seen an atom (because they cannot actually be seen) and I may not even know the evidence or proof them their existence.  However, I have confidence in their existence because I know that the truth of their existence has been examined in a public forum and reviewed by experts in the field.  Here too (in fact even more so), I have no second thoughts about the veracity and importance of these idea.

Finally, we see from (4) that Orthodox/Torah Judaism is not really a religion.  Judaism are not about inspiration, or how spirituality fits into your life, or why bad things happen to good people.  Rather it is an all encompassing knowledge and understanding of all reality.  You can't really ask if questions like, "Is G-d good" because there is no external scale of "good/bad" by which to judge  or even measure Him.  He simply "is", and everything else -- us, good/evil, Coca-Cola -- is nothing but and expression of His will.  The Torah is the blueprint for creation and HaShem has not only allowed us but actually invited us to participate in His magnum opus: Reality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק